The other guys talked about the founders, the Federalist Papers, etc. They lied about some of it, but they were FAR more dynamic speakers than this douche.
This guy is BORING. How the FUCK could you come to a major historical event like this, and sound like Charlie Brown's teacher? WTF?
That's strange, I found the House Managers so far out in left field, there was no factual content to consume. I practically died of boredom waiting to hear something truthful.
Now we have someone accurately quoting the founders, the constitution, and in the correct context. Very educational and completely relevant.
How the fuck did this guy ever win a single court case? He rambles, changes the subject, goes off on tangents, has no coherent message, and zero personality.
Right now they are talking about whether or not it is constitutional to hold the trial. They are NOT talking abut 45's speech, etc. This is plainly about the constitutionality of the trial.
Right now he's talking about what the forefathers have stated.
Much better content than what we had to endure earlier today.
The other guys talked about the founders, the Federalist Papers, etc. They lied about some of it, but they were FAR more dynamic speakers than this douche.
This guy is BORING. How the FUCK could you come to a major historical event like this, and sound like Charlie Brown's teacher? WTF?
That's strange, I found the House Managers so far out in left field, there was no factual content to consume. I practically died of boredom waiting to hear something truthful.
Now we have someone accurately quoting the founders, the constitution, and in the correct context. Very educational and completely relevant.
You are seeing something very different from what I am seeing and hearing.
That first guy has the personality of Joe B. muttering to himself.
I agree. I think we are watching two different shows.
I'm watching the fake impeachment trial in the Senate right now.
How the fuck did this guy ever win a single court case? He rambles, changes the subject, goes off on tangents, has no coherent message, and zero personality.
THIS is the best they could come up with? WTF?
2 minutes into the 2nd guy, and he is MUCH more of a dynamic speaker, and is getting to the point right away.
The first guy was a BIG MISTAKE. He produced NOTHING of value.
Let's see how the other guys do.
If all of this is a show, then it’s getting stranger by the day.
This is a public blowjob to the Senators...makes me sick
It's called a "set-up." He's setting up the defense.
You need to listen.
Right now they are talking about whether or not it is constitutional to hold the trial. They are NOT talking abut 45's speech, etc. This is plainly about the constitutionality of the trial.
No judge said this was constitutional.
I have no idea. But he better get on with what really happened.
Exactly! Just rambling.....
Chewbacca defense
Haha I have no idea, I'm lost trying to understand what he is trying to say or where is going with the rambling
Oh no. We're sunk. Get him off the floor.
Is that how you would see it if he were an impeachment manager?