They're not impeaching Trump to keep him from running 4 years from now. They're doing it because they know the election fraud cases will prove Trump won. Final ammo to fuel the Color Revolution they have planned in a desperate attempt to stop him. Trump's silence= calm before the storm.
(media.greatawakening.win)
NCSWIC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
SILVERTHORNE LUMBER CO. vs. UNITED STATES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States
U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine," and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.
NARDONE vs. UNITED STATES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nardone_v._United_States
Court ruled that evidence obtained via warrantless wiretaps, in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, was inadmissible in federal court. The Court ruled that use of evidence directly obtained from wiretapping, such as the conversations themselves, and indirectly, such as evidence obtained through knowledge gained from wiretapped conversations, was inadmissible in trial court.
https://qanon.pub/?q=fisa%20works%20both%20ways