Stop posting this, you and your fellow 50 cent army comrades keep shilling this crap. It is news from 2007, referring to an event in the 50s/60s, and your link directs to a .cn website. Plus you stupidly misrepresented the data in the title.
Let's get accurate. Some part of all Salk vaccines made between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus, SV 40, and when that was realized it was stopped. Later this accidental cohort was analyzed and did have a significant rise in cancer rates. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10472327/. NIH is a disgrace but probably the seminal source of later reports. However, it is not true that "98 million" had cancer, that's how many vaccines were distributed and not all were polluted.
Stop posting this, you and your fellow 50 cent army comrades keep shilling this crap. It is news from 2007, referring to an event in the 50s/60s, and your link directs to a .cn website. Plus you stupidly misrepresented the data in the title.
These people are stupid.
Let's get accurate. Some part of all Salk vaccines made between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus, SV 40, and when that was realized it was stopped. Later this accidental cohort was analyzed and did have a significant rise in cancer rates. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10472327/. NIH is a disgrace but probably the seminal source of later reports. However, it is not true that "98 million" had cancer, that's how many vaccines were distributed and not all were polluted.