Trump’s impeachment lawyers

posted 3 years ago by LoafersNale 3 years ago by LoafersNale +19 / -0

Are they garbage or nah? Where do these lawyers fit into the plan?

17 comments

17 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (17)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Retaining_H2O 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1

If the verdict has already been decided (which it has)... the goal of the attorneys may be to not change that verdict.

The Senate will rule by about 56 to 44 (possibly even 60 / 40) to find Trump guilty... but they will not reach the 2/3rds required to fully impeach Trump and force any actions. That's the agreed verdict made behind closed doors. The rest is just a show.

Trump's attorneys have two jobs.

Present any evidence they are ALLOWED to show to prove that Trump did nothing wrong.
Don't change the per-arranged verdict by doing or saying something stupid.

That's why they droned on endlessly and didn't really make a point. If possible, they could pull out Dr. Seuss books and read children's stories into the Senate record instead. Anything to fill time and not make any dumb mistakes.

They aren't trying to WIN. They aren't trying not to lose. All they are doing is not changing the agreed upon verdict.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– redtoe-skipper 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

53 / 47

added:

reflecting on what you said, it seems not to jive with your argument.

no jurisdiction
unconstitutional
unamerican.
warning: you are opening the door to a flood, you cannot control.

This is for opening statements what is needed to be said. Delivery is interesting, juxtaposing one lawyer to the other.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Spongebob1808 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

THIS ^

They are NOT trying to WIN....another poor hiring choice, but probably the only lawyers left available.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q