Dude, no offense, but fuck off. You don't know me. I scrutinize everything, including Jill's bullshit photo op on the "lawn" of the White House. I am skeptical of everything I see and need multiole sources, angles, or rationale before I believe something. So, yeah...don't paint me as some gullible shithead just because I played devil's advocate to your comments.
Dude, no offense, but fuck off. You don't know me.
Simply basing my assessment on the argument you present.
Don't be mad that you make awful points.
I scrutinize everything,
You literally told me to watch a video that is obviously garbage and you want to flex your scrutiny game?
looooooool
including Jill's bullshit photo op on the "lawn" of the White House. I am skeptical of everything I see and need multiole sources, angles, or rationale before I believe something. So, yeah...don't paint me as some gullible shithead just because I played devil's advocate to your comments.
Be a better "devil's advocate" because so far you suck at it.
I have.
There is multiple and a variety of sources for the pictures of the new oval office. Full video from multiple angles.
You literally are telling people to use scrutiny WHEN YOU YOURSELF HAVE USED NONE.
Don't be a fucking lunatic. That is reserved for lefties with TDS. Hold yourself to a higher standard.
Dude, no offense, but fuck off. You don't know me. I scrutinize everything, including Jill's bullshit photo op on the "lawn" of the White House. I am skeptical of everything I see and need multiole sources, angles, or rationale before I believe something. So, yeah...don't paint me as some gullible shithead just because I played devil's advocate to your comments.
Simply basing my assessment on the argument you present.
Don't be mad that you make awful points.
You literally told me to watch a video that is obviously garbage and you want to flex your scrutiny game?
looooooool
Be a better "devil's advocate" because so far you suck at it.