The dems are very big on what did the President know, and when did he know it?

Pence was rushed off.

Who was tasked to inform the President?

Then we have: We know he was supposed to know, and he did nothing, so he is guilty of incitement?

Of course such is no proof. It may be a political expedient argument for inquiry, but then again, they should have done their homework, but they only invited Trump to testify AFTER their Impeached him. (see letter) I suspect they did not even send a written request for information.

However, they very strategically avoid talking about own leadership fuck up, denials of insistence and the quite intricate management structure of Washington DC.

I am wondering where this point will be discussed?

Then the legal cases pending in court, and those which where denied: The question about these cases and if there ever was evidence was demonstrated, was answered with a Pennsylvania ruling, that the judge found no evidence would be considered as it would disenfranchise a large swath of voters.

It signals that

1. No evidence was heard
2. There was massive voter fraud.

It seems to me, the lawyers manage the case strictly as should be expected. Attacking the validity of the evidence, framing the question, challenging the jurisdiction, arguing on correct constitutional grounds. It looks like a film script. They also sidestepped the above question, because there was nothing in the file. No due process.

So, when will it be discussed?

Or would it be a question of: letting the antagonist spent ALL their ammo. And then drop the MOAB?

But all in all, these fuckups are being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars from the treasury, money that has to be loaned, to keep us in debt slavery, cause our taxes go to paying the interest. And while they do this, these people suck the money machine in private, via their foundations and family.

8% favorable is way too high. Out of 435 + 100 people, less than 70 can be trusted?