Yes. There's an old Bill Hick's joke about how primitive the Iraqi scuds were back in Desert Storm compared to our guided missiles. "It's one of the pre-requisites of a weapon... I dunno... the ability to aim the fucking thing?.

One of the things that's going to shoot us in the foot constantly is if we keep thinking of war and fighting in the sense traditional kinetic warfare. The story of the Gordian knot is a good example. It's not always about brute force.

The biggest indicator of success on a battlefield is your ability to spot and exploit advantages before your opponent. If you look back at many famous battles you'll notice that one or two decisive movements win the day. David and Goliath. measured action at a vulnerable point does greater damage than great pressure at a brick wall. Vlad the Impaler was successful against the Ottomans because he understood this when he attacked their camps.

China and by proxy the leftist elites understand this. They also understand the role of developing weapons that exploit an enemy's weak points exclusively. Such as funneling heavy cavalry into a narrow space filled with pike blocks. In this book China lays out that there are many different areas where weapons could be developed. Development of these weapons require you to think what you foe thinks is valuable in these terms and then to build around the weak points in their reasoning.

Among areas where China believed in the 90's it could challenge us by developing weapon systems which synergize with strategies are;

Diplomatic warfare- Seemingly oxymoronic but what this entails is essentially exercising hegemony internationally. Think about it. While we fight each other China has wrestled almost complete control of the UN. This was not a case of opportunism. This was intentional. Think Belt and Road. Foreign aid is a way nations project soft power. Many of us hate it but it serves a purpose in geo-politics. I'm not against foreign aid. However, I don't think Pakistan is going to treat queers well regardless of how much money we throw at that. I also think you need to have actual money to conduct foreign aid. Not just add it to the national debt.

Network Warfare- Seemingly an abstract concept until you add social NETWORKING. Networks are groups and pattern that people are apart of either voluntarily or involuntarily. A community is a network. A society is a collection of networks. The internet is a network. TV news stations are a networks. The intelligence community is a network. Your business is a network. This is where Anti-Fa and BLM come in. Anti-Fa and BLM are designed to exploit our networks. Both technological and sociological. They rile up a community and they project on Social Media. BLM and Anti-Fa are the sociological equivalents to Fat Boy and Little Man. They are guided missiles aimed directly at our biggest sociological issues. They make it harder to mobilize a defense against actual enemies.

Biochemical warfare- If you guessed China Virus you'd be right but this is not limited to diseases by the Chinese. America's drug issues can be exploited. Our crops can be contaminated. Homosexuality encouraged as a population control. This strategy evolves breaking down people's body and mental stamina on the very smallest level.

Economic warfare- This is the one most of us are familiar with. Again the public conception is small compared to the big picture. Do you remember the wildfires over the summer caused by Anti-Fa which strained California's power supply? This was economic warfare. Destroying infrastructure is a form of this. Even destroying crops and resources by destroying mines and dropping agent orange makes it harder to gather resources. Destroying the environment give your enemy less place to hide. Compromising business leaders to funnel money to your own business interests.

Kinetic Warfare- Traditional warfare. This includes nuclear warfare. In fact deterrence plays an even bigger part in this type of war. Why blow up the world when you can just waltz into a land of sick, starved and desperate enemies? China wouldn't want to blow us up. They want our land for their food supply. When you mix these weapons systems together you get a strategy.

The prevalence of homosexuality among the youth for example is a bio-chemical network attack. When you force you enemies to adopt a climate change agenda you're using a econo-diplomatic strategy. Running compromised, controlled opposition candidates is a triple Econo-diplomatic Network strategy. If we do not outsmart out enemy they will wipe the floor with us in time. A good place to start fighting back is to arm ourselves with knowledge.