I wrote this in a message to another user regarding the veracity and trustworthiness of George, the media family that's been keeping our hopes up via the Chat Lines:
Something I found myself whilst capturing George Chat Lines was that on the night of Jan 27-28, a certain lady named Lana Burke jumped in on chat. This is the pseudonym of Liz Crokin, the journalist who first broke open Pizzagate. And, assuming all parties are legit, she trusted George to such an extent that she allowed George to verify her identity by confirming that they talked about Conan the Military Dog. Later for that night only, George purportedly posted a photo album of Conan on Telegram (the images are classified by virtue of Conan being the military service dog who participated in the raid against Osama Bin Laden Baghdadi), and the reaction of the chat points to this happening.
But while the album itself is deleted, one thumbnail picture remains on Liz's Telegram, now verified by George.
This picture, when inspected, is a photo showing Trump's Grandson, the rear view of a statuette of Conan, and the new paint scheme of Air Force One, with Trump talking to his children in the background, and does not exist anywhere else on the internet according to Tineye. This thumbnail confirms to me that George has direct access to classified information of at least the photo and video variety, and has a keen eye for symbolism.
It wouldn't mean anything to anyone else except those who want to know if we can trust George or not.
https://www.reverseimagesearch.com/ to search in a couple of search engines at the same time. Bing has the best algos for detecting who's in the pictures. REALLY HANDY !
Nice work Really in depth... what are you getting at !!
I wrote this in a message to another user regarding the veracity and trustworthiness of George, the media family that's been keeping our hopes up via the Chat Lines:
It wouldn't mean anything to anyone else except those who want to know if we can trust George or not.
Gotcha good grab
Baghdadi, not bin Laden
Thanks, that was an embarrassingly careless mistake (it was even in the wikipedia article right there.)
No worries brothers. Don't beat yourself up over it
I would caution against using Tineye as the end all.
Just saying, a metric Stacy Abrams of images don't appear on Tineye nor Google's own reverse image searches
^
Yandex.
https://www.reverseimagesearch.com/ to search in a couple of search engines at the same time. Bing has the best algos for detecting who's in the pictures. REALLY HANDY !
10-4