Witnesses would have been great. It was only when the defense told the other side what witnesses they would call that Schumer moved to shut down all witnesses.
They were sneaky about it (like they usually are) and most people didn't understand what they had done.
I've seen claims about what the defense said they would do, but nothing official. One person said they were going to call Pelosi. Another said they had a list of 300 witnesses.
Something happened, and the puzzling thing is why the defense would not object to overriding the vote to have witnesses.
Another great opportunity to red pill the public -- missed.
As it stands now, a lot of people think there was an "insurrection" and that the election fraud is "a big lie."
The defense did NOTHING to refute those two things, and they had the perfect opportunity to do it.
I completely agree with your last comment. I think they wanted to focus on the Article of Impeachment, but they missed a GREAT opportunity to present the election info to the public.
I think the D back down from witnesses when Van der Veen said he would subpoena Nazi and Harris. I didn't hear much about it after that.
Hopefully, once his cases are heard in court the results will come out in the media - HOPEFULLY!
Witnesses would have been great. It was only when the defense told the other side what witnesses they would call that Schumer moved to shut down all witnesses.
They were sneaky about it (like they usually are) and most people didn't understand what they had done.
I've seen claims about what the defense said they would do, but nothing official. One person said they were going to call Pelosi. Another said they had a list of 300 witnesses.
Something happened, and the puzzling thing is why the defense would not object to overriding the vote to have witnesses.
Another great opportunity to red pill the public -- missed.
As it stands now, a lot of people think there was an "insurrection" and that the election fraud is "a big lie."
The defense did NOTHING to refute those two things, and they had the perfect opportunity to do it.
I completely agree with your last comment. I think they wanted to focus on the Article of Impeachment, but they missed a GREAT opportunity to present the election info to the public.
I think the D back down from witnesses when Van der Veen said he would subpoena Nazi and Harris. I didn't hear much about it after that.
Hopefully, once his cases are heard in court the results will come out in the media - HOPEFULLY!