But why would you think that? Why would it STILL look like a movie if it failed? Everything is playing out exactly as we were told. Things are getting worse and worse (apparently) but very little actual harm is really happening. On the other hand, more and more people are regretting their choice every day. More and more people are seeing that they might have been lied to.
Last week, among 100 other ridiculous (movie like) things that happened, we got Time magazine ADMIT that the election was manipulated by "An elite Cabal". And you think they did that by their choice?!?
Millions of sleepers also got to see the reality of Trumps "most heinous crimes": The speech that incited a violent Insurrection. and the speech that said "White Nationalist and Nazi's are very fine people." Both of these things were finally seen IN FULL CONTEXT by everyone that was interested in seeing Trump hang. That's gonna cause an awful lot of people questioning their reality.
Again, take fear out of the equation. What do you see? That the plan is unfolding exactly as we were told it would, or that it is failing, and yet still exactly as we were told it was going to work.
Do people think that Time was forced to write that article...? Did you guys even read the article?
It was "yeah ok Trump was TECHNICALLY right, but here's what we really did and it was TOTALLY legal and we TOTALLY saved the country from evil drumpf!"
If they were forced by the good guys to write that, that was a very stupid thing to do. They described every event as totally legal and not at all corrupt and, "hey, it got rid of trump! we saved democracy!!" It seems far more likely that Time figured that, eventually, information about the election being rigged would become mainstream so they are trying to control the narrative in the event that occurs so the left excuses their crimes.
The point was not to tell the whole truth, the point was to get people to question reality. Just like how Q does things. Get people to start asking questions. That's the path towards the awakening.
The Time article stated explicitly that they are totally evil ("elite Cabal" lol. Their words, not mine). They stated explicitly that they did exactly the opposite of democracy to save democracy. Will some people buy it? Sure, some really are that asleep. But in general people are asleep, they aren't stupid. You can't say "I'm telling you explicitly that I'm doing exactly the opposite of what I'm saying I'm doing" and expect a large portion of people to not start questioning if their beliefs represent reality.
I don't KNOW what is really going on, but I do know that if I were running a "wake people up" PsyOp and I wanted to reach the population that read Time magazine I would write exactly that article.
But why would you think that? Why would it STILL look like a movie if it failed? Everything is playing out exactly as we were told. Things are getting worse and worse (apparently) but very little actual harm is really happening. On the other hand, more and more people are regretting their choice every day. More and more people are seeing that they might have been lied to.
Last week, among 100 other ridiculous (movie like) things that happened, we got Time magazine ADMIT that the election was manipulated by "An elite Cabal". And you think they did that by their choice?!?
Millions of sleepers also got to see the reality of Trumps "most heinous crimes": The speech that incited a violent Insurrection. and the speech that said "White Nationalist and Nazi's are very fine people." Both of these things were finally seen IN FULL CONTEXT by everyone that was interested in seeing Trump hang. That's gonna cause an awful lot of people questioning their reality.
Again, take fear out of the equation. What do you see? That the plan is unfolding exactly as we were told it would, or that it is failing, and yet still exactly as we were told it was going to work.
Do people think that Time was forced to write that article...? Did you guys even read the article?
It was "yeah ok Trump was TECHNICALLY right, but here's what we really did and it was TOTALLY legal and we TOTALLY saved the country from evil drumpf!"
If they were forced by the good guys to write that, that was a very stupid thing to do. They described every event as totally legal and not at all corrupt and, "hey, it got rid of trump! we saved democracy!!" It seems far more likely that Time figured that, eventually, information about the election being rigged would become mainstream so they are trying to control the narrative in the event that occurs so the left excuses their crimes.
I read the whole thing.
The point was not to tell the whole truth, the point was to get people to question reality. Just like how Q does things. Get people to start asking questions. That's the path towards the awakening.
The Time article stated explicitly that they are totally evil ("elite Cabal" lol. Their words, not mine). They stated explicitly that they did exactly the opposite of democracy to save democracy. Will some people buy it? Sure, some really are that asleep. But in general people are asleep, they aren't stupid. You can't say "I'm telling you explicitly that I'm doing exactly the opposite of what I'm saying I'm doing" and expect a large portion of people to not start questioning if their beliefs represent reality.
I don't KNOW what is really going on, but I do know that if I were running a "wake people up" PsyOp and I wanted to reach the population that read Time magazine I would write exactly that article.