Either he knew about it and didn’t act, which would be unpardonable. Or he somehow didn’t find out about it until he no longer lived there? That just seems way too far-fetched for me.
Am I missing something here that someone can help me with?
Either he knew about it and didn’t act, which would be unpardonable. Or he somehow didn’t find out about it until he no longer lived there? That just seems way too far-fetched for me.
Am I missing something here that someone can help me with?
I clearly missed something. Could someone please point me to the article or news on this? Thanks.