So glad that Trump finally got some good attorneys!
To be fair though, I watched it back and she was describing what he was referring to in an unbiased way - and he cut her off before she could put her spin on it at the end! ?
Also these "reporters" are usually just repeating what 10 producers in the control room are saying in her earpiece. That's why she has to speak kind of slowly and you can tell she is listening. That's exactly what Biden and Harris do all the time if they're not reading off the teleprompter
Get out, shill. You must have missed the part where she qualified the evidence doctoring. It doesn't matter how big/small it is. Bringing fake evidence into a court is a huge deal.
What they doctored is irrelevant. She was qualifying the severity of doctoring evidence. If you don't think that's a big deal then I don't know what to tell you except you're wrong. He was right to skewer her.
That's my take on it, as well. He said what needed to be said, but he spoke too soon. It's fair that she wants to clarify to the viewer exactly what doctored evidence he's referring to. He should have waited for her to finish with her biased take and then called her out on it.
Hahahahaha. I think your view is funny and helpful to the enemy.
It’s the WAY she was calling out the evidence that had to be stopped and addressed. No need to let them get their full excuse clip out completely unaddressed.
Her bias was evident in her speaking about the simple little check mark. Anyone unfamiliar with twitter would scoff at such a simple change. Which is the media’s desired outcome.
About the shills from td.wn mods. Why changing the subject is an issue etc. good for understanding tactics.
Yep exactly. Also the first two questions he answered with a short response and caught them off guard. ? Frankly most people who are interviewed on TV give long responses, which gives the fake news an opportunity to twist your words.
Be short, and straight to the point and watch them scramble to have to respond with several new questions ?✔
So glad that Trump finally got some good attorneys!
To be fair though, I watched it back and she was describing what he was referring to in an unbiased way - and he cut her off before she could put her spin on it at the end! ?
Also these "reporters" are usually just repeating what 10 producers in the control room are saying in her earpiece. That's why she has to speak kind of slowly and you can tell she is listening. That's exactly what Biden and Harris do all the time if they're not reading off the teleprompter
Get out, shill. You must have missed the part where she qualified the evidence doctoring. It doesn't matter how big/small it is. Bringing fake evidence into a court is a huge deal.
Shill? Lmao. Open your eyes and ears. Don't attack me.
"To be clear for our viewers... "
Yea she should have condemned it more than she did, but we all know that wasn't going to happen.
This reporter at least gave him a chance to talk unlike CNN/ABC
What they doctored is irrelevant. She was qualifying the severity of doctoring evidence. If you don't think that's a big deal then I don't know what to tell you except you're wrong. He was right to skewer her.
Dude we agree, that's what I was trying to say in addition to saying that he beat her to the punch by not letting her spin it first. ?
That's my take on it, as well. He said what needed to be said, but he spoke too soon. It's fair that she wants to clarify to the viewer exactly what doctored evidence he's referring to. He should have waited for her to finish with her biased take and then called her out on it.
Hahahahaha. I think your view is funny and helpful to the enemy.
It’s the WAY she was calling out the evidence that had to be stopped and addressed. No need to let them get their full excuse clip out completely unaddressed.
Her bias was evident in her speaking about the simple little check mark. Anyone unfamiliar with twitter would scoff at such a simple change. Which is the media’s desired outcome.
About the shills from td.wn mods. Why changing the subject is an issue etc. good for understanding tactics.
https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
Yep exactly. Also the first two questions he answered with a short response and caught them off guard. ? Frankly most people who are interviewed on TV give long responses, which gives the fake news an opportunity to twist your words.
Be short, and straight to the point and watch them scramble to have to respond with several new questions ?✔