You haven't seen her alive since then. I haven't seen her alive since then. But did you ask everyone in the world?
True. No funeral, but a memorial.
The guard at the capitol fired a gun in her general direction. But there is video evidence that strongly supports the notion that the line of gunfire at the moment of the trigger pull, before the recoil was no where close to her neck. If he was firing real bullets it should have hit her midsection somewhere.
There was basically zero blood. She supposedly got hit in the neck but there was no visible wound anywhere on her body in any shot. There was no blood coming out of her neck. There was no apparent blood on the flag around her neck. There was only blood coming out of her mouth (just like if she bit down on a blood pellet). After they moved her there was the most pathetic "blood pool" on the ground I've ever seen. A kleenix would have wiped up the entirety of her apparent blood loss.
Watch the video that's been posted. It gives all the camera angles in great detail. Turn off the sound if you don't want any other input. Look for yourself.
I said to watch it to get the camera angles. I said to look at my points yourself with the video evidence and to turn off the audio if you didn't want the bias. Yet you come back without a single address nor dispute on the points I made which are easily seen in the video.
Can you show links to your fact that they are holding a memorial service for her ? Who is? Where is it being held ? Is there an announcement printed somewhere that you can link to ?
And what is your objective critique to anything said in that video? I haven't heard you address the pathetic pool of blood she left after being shot in the neck. Barely any blood spilling as they carried her down the stairs. Officers never clearing the area. Nobody applying medical assistance to her. Officer standing there holding a moist towelette in his hand for 5 minutes and not doing anything with it. Please, I want to hear your objective breakdown of why all of that should be tossed out, but we should embrace the official story? Brought to us by the same people who gave us Sandy Hook, 9/11, and JFK.
1- She hasn't been seen alive? Wow, that proves nothing. When the criminal cabal deepstate runs a false flag shooting, yes, you typically don't see the involved party in the grocery store the next day. They are sloppy, but they aren't that sloppy. 1- Deep fakes. Do we even know she's real? 2- She herself could be CIA or deepstate or a foreign asset, we have no idea. She could be sipping champagne on a private island right now. 3- With a change of hair color and minor surgery, you would never recognize Ashley Babbit. Which likely isn't her real name.
2- Yes, that is what they would do if they staged a fake shooting. They also had Sandy Hook "parents' grieving in the media. David Fagg is still a recurring character in our life after Parkland. This is what these people do.
3- So, we are contesting that that guard didn't actually shoot her, and one of your answers to prove it wrong is that "the guard shot her." That's exactly what we're contesting. Simply stating the media narrative is not a counterargument. Was it a blank? Was she actually shot and murdered? That's the question at hand.
4- Fake blood is a thing. Awfully convenient that she was wearing such a huge bookbag at the time, 1- It broke her fall, 2- It could've contained breakable blood packets meant to explode when she landed. But in all actuality, there was very little blood lying around for someone who was shot in the damn neck. At times in the video, it's shown that the blood is not following logical flow if it were truly coming from her neck and not the bookbag.
5- Do you really think these people wouldn't stage a shooting? Really? Like, really really?
Lets go through your facts.
Watch the video that's been posted. It gives all the camera angles in great detail. Turn off the sound if you don't want any other input. Look for yourself.
I said to watch it to get the camera angles. I said to look at my points yourself with the video evidence and to turn off the audio if you didn't want the bias. Yet you come back without a single address nor dispute on the points I made which are easily seen in the video.
Can you show links to your fact that they are holding a memorial service for her ? Who is? Where is it being held ? Is there an announcement printed somewhere that you can link to ?
Obviously, i know as well as you but have you watched this? Compelling challenges: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41/
I’m not sure I’m convinced Ashli Babbit is even a real person. Just saying.
And what is your objective critique to anything said in that video? I haven't heard you address the pathetic pool of blood she left after being shot in the neck. Barely any blood spilling as they carried her down the stairs. Officers never clearing the area. Nobody applying medical assistance to her. Officer standing there holding a moist towelette in his hand for 5 minutes and not doing anything with it. Please, I want to hear your objective breakdown of why all of that should be tossed out, but we should embrace the official story? Brought to us by the same people who gave us Sandy Hook, 9/11, and JFK.
Your reasons are absurd here.
1- She hasn't been seen alive? Wow, that proves nothing. When the criminal cabal deepstate runs a false flag shooting, yes, you typically don't see the involved party in the grocery store the next day. They are sloppy, but they aren't that sloppy. 1- Deep fakes. Do we even know she's real? 2- She herself could be CIA or deepstate or a foreign asset, we have no idea. She could be sipping champagne on a private island right now. 3- With a change of hair color and minor surgery, you would never recognize Ashley Babbit. Which likely isn't her real name.
2- Yes, that is what they would do if they staged a fake shooting. They also had Sandy Hook "parents' grieving in the media. David Fagg is still a recurring character in our life after Parkland. This is what these people do.
3- So, we are contesting that that guard didn't actually shoot her, and one of your answers to prove it wrong is that "the guard shot her." That's exactly what we're contesting. Simply stating the media narrative is not a counterargument. Was it a blank? Was she actually shot and murdered? That's the question at hand.
4- Fake blood is a thing. Awfully convenient that she was wearing such a huge bookbag at the time, 1- It broke her fall, 2- It could've contained breakable blood packets meant to explode when she landed. But in all actuality, there was very little blood lying around for someone who was shot in the damn neck. At times in the video, it's shown that the blood is not following logical flow if it were truly coming from her neck and not the bookbag.
5- Do you really think these people wouldn't stage a shooting? Really? Like, really really?