But the overwhelming majority ARE found safe! Most reports are from parents reporting their kids missing when they don't come home from school, only to later remember their kids went to the game practice, or to their friends, or whatever. And some are teenagers who 'run away'.
If half-a-million kids went missing, per year, and assuming they are not killed (what would be the point of that), then where are they? How do you house them without detection?
Great point, to focus on the effect of a missing child on the school - no way such volumes of missing kids would go unnoticed.
There was a local story in my 'hood that a mixed-race parent was arrested because some 'child trafficking' warrior called the cops when they saw a dark-skinned adult with a white-skinned child; they assumed this must be a kidnapped child. And there was a story on this forum recently suggesting that mask-wearing is a ploy to help with the kidnapping of children, since by wearing a mask, you can't hear the child scream! Try closing your lips and then shouting at the top of your lungs - you don't need to open your mouth to make a noise!
All this 'child eating cabal' nonsense is diverting attention from the real problems of child trafficking.
Your questions - what would be the point of killing them, where would you house them - can't be serious. Either you are brand new here, or you are intentionally trying to mislead.
Well, first of all, are you asserting they are being killed or kept alive? You can't have it both ways. If they are being killed, what's the point, and if they are being kept alive, where are they kept?
But another poster on here just made a far more relevant point. For that volume of children to disappear, we'd be seeing several children disappearing from EVERY school in the country, EVERY year. There is no way that level of disappearance is going to go unnoticed.
But the overwhelming majority ARE found safe! Most reports are from parents reporting their kids missing when they don't come home from school, only to later remember their kids went to the game practice, or to their friends, or whatever. And some are teenagers who 'run away'.
If half-a-million kids went missing, per year, and assuming they are not killed (what would be the point of that), then where are they? How do you house them without detection?
Great point, to focus on the effect of a missing child on the school - no way such volumes of missing kids would go unnoticed.
There was a local story in my 'hood that a mixed-race parent was arrested because some 'child trafficking' warrior called the cops when they saw a dark-skinned adult with a white-skinned child; they assumed this must be a kidnapped child. And there was a story on this forum recently suggesting that mask-wearing is a ploy to help with the kidnapping of children, since by wearing a mask, you can't hear the child scream! Try closing your lips and then shouting at the top of your lungs - you don't need to open your mouth to make a noise!
All this 'child eating cabal' nonsense is diverting attention from the real problems of child trafficking.
Yea. Also 450k is what, 9k kids per state? That's about 850 kids a month. Your phone would be going off from amber alerts multiple times a day.
Your questions - what would be the point of killing them, where would you house them - can't be serious. Either you are brand new here, or you are intentionally trying to mislead.
Well, first of all, are you asserting they are being killed or kept alive? You can't have it both ways. If they are being killed, what's the point, and if they are being kept alive, where are they kept?
But another poster on here just made a far more relevant point. For that volume of children to disappear, we'd be seeing several children disappearing from EVERY school in the country, EVERY year. There is no way that level of disappearance is going to go unnoticed.