Parler is back up
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Did you actually read the rest of the comment? Probably not. But I am full well and aware of how it works. But the economy actually was pretty decent during his years regardless of fiat rigging. Allow me to put it in context for you I said George W. Bush would have been a better fit for the picture I was commenting on
Let me help you:
Presidents have NOTHING to do with economies. NOTHING.
Their primary power is to sign legislation. That's it.
The state of the economy at any point in the Keynesian cycle is whereever the Cabal wants is to be.
The economy rocketed (in dollar valuation) under Clinton (and Reagan, and Trump, etc) because the Fed inflated the money-supply.