Yeah gonna still stick with AJ/Snowden. AJ doesn't like Q, Q doesn't like AJ. I don't really care. They are good for different things and shine light on different subjects. AJ has been in this game for decades and has a decent history of hitting things on the head. He's redpilled more millions than Q can imagine, he's the trailblazer. He's a net positive to the movement of waking people up. If you need someone to tell you what opinion to have about someone else, you're the one who is controlled.
For context obviously I follow Q as well because I'm here. I just don't care what they have to say about each other. Neither of them is infallible to me.
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
And I don’t even listen to him more than maybe once a year. Just because he was good doesn’t mean he still is good. He could’ve sold out at some point and the fact that he tried to hijack Q was a pretty big red flag. So I have doubts whether he’s a net positive or net negative for people seeking truth.
Snowden? Snowden constantly gets invited to do webex calls at Silicon Valley tech events. In the last 5 years, anyone who’s managed to really land a punch with the establishment has been censored, lost their jobs, lost their house, been visited by the FBI, ended up in jail, or ended up dead in a car crash. If you’re really sticking it to the man, you don’t get the celebrity in exile treatment.
How many movies have been made about Snowden at this point? Hollywood and/or documentary style? And how many movies have they made about Q? Q is probably the most interesting thing I’ve ever come across. Why has Hollywood (aside from smearing it) ignored Q or consistently misrepresented it?
I think they ignore it because there is something about Q that threatens the establishment far more than any Snowden or Alex Jones ever did.
Who can say for sure but for as long as I’ve followed those two, I see it in the reverse.
Glenn Beck was actually good back in the day. He was the one who brought the Saul Alinsky stuff to my attention, and the cloward piven strategy. Then he sold out, went semi mainstream and got all kinds of lucrative gigs. It wasn’t until halfway through Trump’s term that he started breaking stuff related to Ukraine.
I don’t follow either of that that closely but Beck kinda redeemed himself with the Biden-Ukraine phone calls he released. That and all the other materials he released were legit Journalism in my opinion.
They’re probably both controlled opposition to some degree but Glenn Beck seemed to get better once Q happened, whereas Alex Jones got worse.
Yeah gonna still stick with AJ/Snowden. AJ doesn't like Q, Q doesn't like AJ. I don't really care. They are good for different things and shine light on different subjects. AJ has been in this game for decades and has a decent history of hitting things on the head. He's redpilled more millions than Q can imagine, he's the trailblazer. He's a net positive to the movement of waking people up. If you need someone to tell you what opinion to have about someone else, you're the one who is controlled.
For context obviously I follow Q as well because I'm here. I just don't care what they have to say about each other. Neither of them is infallible to me.
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
And I don’t even listen to him more than maybe once a year. Just because he was good doesn’t mean he still is good. He could’ve sold out at some point and the fact that he tried to hijack Q was a pretty big red flag. So I have doubts whether he’s a net positive or net negative for people seeking truth.
Snowden? Snowden constantly gets invited to do webex calls at Silicon Valley tech events. In the last 5 years, anyone who’s managed to really land a punch with the establishment has been censored, lost their jobs, lost their house, been visited by the FBI, ended up in jail, or ended up dead in a car crash. If you’re really sticking it to the man, you don’t get the celebrity in exile treatment.
How many movies have been made about Snowden at this point? Hollywood and/or documentary style? And how many movies have they made about Q? Q is probably the most interesting thing I’ve ever come across. Why has Hollywood (aside from smearing it) ignored Q or consistently misrepresented it?
I think they ignore it because there is something about Q that threatens the establishment far more than any Snowden or Alex Jones ever did.
Glenn Beck sold out. Alex Jones did not.
Who can say for sure but for as long as I’ve followed those two, I see it in the reverse.
Glenn Beck was actually good back in the day. He was the one who brought the Saul Alinsky stuff to my attention, and the cloward piven strategy. Then he sold out, went semi mainstream and got all kinds of lucrative gigs. It wasn’t until halfway through Trump’s term that he started breaking stuff related to Ukraine.
I don’t follow either of that that closely but Beck kinda redeemed himself with the Biden-Ukraine phone calls he released. That and all the other materials he released were legit Journalism in my opinion.
They’re probably both controlled opposition to some degree but Glenn Beck seemed to get better once Q happened, whereas Alex Jones got worse.