Yeah gonna still stick with AJ/Snowden. AJ doesn't like Q, Q doesn't like AJ. I don't really care. They are good for different things and shine light on different subjects. AJ has been in this game for decades and has a decent history of hitting things on the head. He's redpilled more millions than Q can imagine, he's the trailblazer. He's a net positive to the movement of waking people up. If you need someone to tell you what opinion to have about someone else, you're the one who is controlled.
For context obviously I follow Q as well because I'm here. I just don't care what they have to say about each other. Neither of them is infallible to me.
Redpilling is a necessary part of the Q objective, but it's not the only one, and possibly not the central one. Saving the country by restoring honest government and eliminating commies and other foreign influencers is a biggie. AJ is foreign controlled, so eventually has to go. Listen if you like but be aware. Perverted truth at best is less healthy than truth, and at worst is poisonous.
wasnt there a q post about "cutting their strings" like freeing people like AJ from their blackmail handlers etc. They are not bad guys but got compromised and now have to dance to a tune.
I certainly believe in second chances and forgiveness when appropriate. But even if he's been turned, we still don't know whether to trust what he says or not, as the turning may involve playing to the old masters to some degree. I've never listed to Alex Jones, so I don't have strong opinions one way or another. But with the Q posts, I'd rather just stay away and learn things without that particular influencer.
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
And I don’t even listen to him more than maybe once a year. Just because he was good doesn’t mean he still is good. He could’ve sold out at some point and the fact that he tried to hijack Q was a pretty big red flag. So I have doubts whether he’s a net positive or net negative for people seeking truth.
Snowden? Snowden constantly gets invited to do webex calls at Silicon Valley tech events. In the last 5 years, anyone who’s managed to really land a punch with the establishment has been censored, lost their jobs, lost their house, been visited by the FBI, ended up in jail, or ended up dead in a car crash. If you’re really sticking it to the man, you don’t get the celebrity in exile treatment.
How many movies have been made about Snowden at this point? Hollywood and/or documentary style? And how many movies have they made about Q? Q is probably the most interesting thing I’ve ever come across. Why has Hollywood (aside from smearing it) ignored Q or consistently misrepresented it?
I think they ignore it because there is something about Q that threatens the establishment far more than any Snowden or Alex Jones ever did.
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
This is EXACTLY the point of controlled opposition. Jones provides an easy rebuff when normies and skeptics are presented with any true or real information that he has already touched.
He sets up his image as discredited in the eyes of the mainstream, and then proceeds to poison (intellectually) anything he touches.
Who can say for sure but for as long as I’ve followed those two, I see it in the reverse.
Glenn Beck was actually good back in the day. He was the one who brought the Saul Alinsky stuff to my attention, and the cloward piven strategy. Then he sold out, went semi mainstream and got all kinds of lucrative gigs. It wasn’t until halfway through Trump’s term that he started breaking stuff related to Ukraine.
I don’t follow either of that that closely but Beck kinda redeemed himself with the Biden-Ukraine phone calls he released. That and all the other materials he released were legit Journalism in my opinion.
They’re probably both controlled opposition to some degree but Glenn Beck seemed to get better once Q happened, whereas Alex Jones got worse.
AJ literally tried to say his boy Zack talked to Qanon. How the fuck you can be on the qtrain and still give him any time of day outside of his humor? He is the most successful limited hangout of all time. You really think he got that footage of Bohemian Grove by parking on the side of a public road and backpacking to his vantage point?
Yes I do. I've seen fake "leaked" videos. Production quality is significantly higher.
I'm also not a blind faith follower of any one person or source and I'm still not entirely convinced Q is real, let alone waging some secret war against the bad guys. Until public proof is made and/or Trump is reinstalled, Q remains a fascinating coincidence.
Don't get me wrong. I want it to be real. But want and reality... Don't always align.
Yeah, AJ has been around a long time. The idea that he was created to counter Q is laughable. Still, he might be an agent or compromised at this point as some suggest. Hard to tell. Though I agree with those who call him out for running around and yelling 1776 everywhere before Jan 6th and then singing a different tune after the events of that day...
Yeah gonna still stick with AJ/Snowden. AJ doesn't like Q, Q doesn't like AJ. I don't really care. They are good for different things and shine light on different subjects. AJ has been in this game for decades and has a decent history of hitting things on the head. He's redpilled more millions than Q can imagine, he's the trailblazer. He's a net positive to the movement of waking people up. If you need someone to tell you what opinion to have about someone else, you're the one who is controlled.
For context obviously I follow Q as well because I'm here. I just don't care what they have to say about each other. Neither of them is infallible to me.
Redpilling is a necessary part of the Q objective, but it's not the only one, and possibly not the central one. Saving the country by restoring honest government and eliminating commies and other foreign influencers is a biggie. AJ is foreign controlled, so eventually has to go. Listen if you like but be aware. Perverted truth at best is less healthy than truth, and at worst is poisonous.
wasnt there a q post about "cutting their strings" like freeing people like AJ from their blackmail handlers etc. They are not bad guys but got compromised and now have to dance to a tune.
I certainly believe in second chances and forgiveness when appropriate. But even if he's been turned, we still don't know whether to trust what he says or not, as the turning may involve playing to the old masters to some degree. I've never listed to Alex Jones, so I don't have strong opinions one way or another. But with the Q posts, I'd rather just stay away and learn things without that particular influencer.
Yeah exactly what I'm saying, never take anyone's word as 100% truth. Always critically think for yourself.
Source please.
It's in the Qpost listed by the OP. Right hand side near the top.
Post the link if you believe in it so badly.
EDIT: Downvotes are not sources or proof, ding dongs.
That's all you got?
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
And I don’t even listen to him more than maybe once a year. Just because he was good doesn’t mean he still is good. He could’ve sold out at some point and the fact that he tried to hijack Q was a pretty big red flag. So I have doubts whether he’s a net positive or net negative for people seeking truth.
Snowden? Snowden constantly gets invited to do webex calls at Silicon Valley tech events. In the last 5 years, anyone who’s managed to really land a punch with the establishment has been censored, lost their jobs, lost their house, been visited by the FBI, ended up in jail, or ended up dead in a car crash. If you’re really sticking it to the man, you don’t get the celebrity in exile treatment.
How many movies have been made about Snowden at this point? Hollywood and/or documentary style? And how many movies have they made about Q? Q is probably the most interesting thing I’ve ever come across. Why has Hollywood (aside from smearing it) ignored Q or consistently misrepresented it?
I think they ignore it because there is something about Q that threatens the establishment far more than any Snowden or Alex Jones ever did.
This is EXACTLY the point of controlled opposition. Jones provides an easy rebuff when normies and skeptics are presented with any true or real information that he has already touched.
He sets up his image as discredited in the eyes of the mainstream, and then proceeds to poison (intellectually) anything he touches.
Glenn Beck sold out. Alex Jones did not.
Who can say for sure but for as long as I’ve followed those two, I see it in the reverse.
Glenn Beck was actually good back in the day. He was the one who brought the Saul Alinsky stuff to my attention, and the cloward piven strategy. Then he sold out, went semi mainstream and got all kinds of lucrative gigs. It wasn’t until halfway through Trump’s term that he started breaking stuff related to Ukraine.
I don’t follow either of that that closely but Beck kinda redeemed himself with the Biden-Ukraine phone calls he released. That and all the other materials he released were legit Journalism in my opinion.
They’re probably both controlled opposition to some degree but Glenn Beck seemed to get better once Q happened, whereas Alex Jones got worse.
AJ literally tried to say his boy Zack talked to Qanon. How the fuck you can be on the qtrain and still give him any time of day outside of his humor? He is the most successful limited hangout of all time. You really think he got that footage of Bohemian Grove by parking on the side of a public road and backpacking to his vantage point?
Yes I do. I've seen fake "leaked" videos. Production quality is significantly higher.
I'm also not a blind faith follower of any one person or source and I'm still not entirely convinced Q is real, let alone waging some secret war against the bad guys. Until public proof is made and/or Trump is reinstalled, Q remains a fascinating coincidence.
Don't get me wrong. I want it to be real. But want and reality... Don't always align.
Knowing what I know now about Hollywood the fact that Snowden got a movie portraying him positively is reason enough to be suspicious of him.
Yeah, AJ has been around a long time. The idea that he was created to counter Q is laughable. Still, he might be an agent or compromised at this point as some suggest. Hard to tell. Though I agree with those who call him out for running around and yelling 1776 everywhere before Jan 6th and then singing a different tune after the events of that day...
AJ's dad was/is C_A. AJ works with/for Stratfor. What else needs to be said?
I found the link below, but no interview. Got a link to the interview?
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-wilbur-ross-commerce-20161208-story.html