I don't remember seeing this. Anyone else? Over the past several months, Johnheretohelp tweeted about Chief Justice John Roberts. He is retweeting and adding to it today:
The "intelligence community" has been using Dominion, Scorecard, etc. And companies (fronts) like SCYTL for Years to manipulate ELECTIONS overseas, and to various levels here in the U.S. since at least 2006. ALL Approved through the FISA court.
I wonder if anyone has connected that "Chief" Justice Roberts has been "Approving" this type of Election interference personally since then? But I'm SURE he knew nothing about the election fraud using these "Exact Same Methods" during the 2020 Election
Probably came as a complete surprise ... So he is completely impartial and hearing any case on the 2020 Election wouldn't compromise any ILLEGAL overseas operations he has approved or has knowledge of ... Naaah! All good
The DOJ National Security Division, really the CIA in the US, has been approving/directing covert operations for years. No wonder they wanted control of Roberts, and FISA, it was their free pass to do anything they wanted "legally"
Now, CCIPS came about because a few years prior to it's start the "national Security division of the doj" began. And quickly got out of control. Lawyers actually started guiding then planning our covert intelligence operations. They want to be THE intelligence agency above all.
Because Roberts was/is part of the Coup against President Trump. He controlled FISA court. If the true extant of the fisa abuse is known it leads to him. He's trying to stop that.
Roberts directed, approved, and covered for illegal surveillance against President Trump, General Flynn, political adversaries, business rivals, and U.S. and Foreign citizens. He covered for illegal activities committed by our intelligence agencies here and abroad.
I'm told everything that is being submitted will be on the public record. Should make me popular
Roberts must recuse or be removed.
President Trump can start moving back into the White House on February 19th! On step at a time.
https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1361354582941704195
So ...
- CIA is not allowed by law to spy on US persons, only foreign persons
- CIA corrupt agents do not like that limitation
- CIA corrupt agents got FBI corrupt agents to form the DOJ Counter Intelligence Agency, so they could use that office to do domestically what CIA is not allowed to do by law (totally illegal, of course)
- The person who held that office, and was the liason between CIA corrupt agents and FBI corrupt agents was ... Peter Strzok
- In addition, CIA corrupt agents made sure that John Roberts became the Chief Justice -- not just any position, but it was important to make sure he got that particular seat, because ...
- Chief Justice is the one who has oversight over the FISA court
- By having Roberts control the FISA court, and its judges, and its rulings, and its willingness to conspire in the illegal spying operations of the CIA corrupt agents, via the FBI corrupt agents, they had a lid on any real investigations into their illegal operations, because everything can be done in secret ("national security")
- Remember, it was "FBI contractors" (companies like Fusion GPS, if not them specifically) that were UNMASKING ILLEGALLY via the NSA database, that Adm. Rogers discovered
- Remember, The Hammer is the CIA computer being used to do illegal activity that they can't get done through the NSA
- Remember, Five Eyes could access data and give it to the CIA corrupt agents in anything that the CIA/FBI was blocked from getting
- Remember, Snowden was a CIA corrupt agent who infiltrated the NSA for the purpose of causing a stink to get the NSA's full spy op shut down (good, but not for the right reasons) so that the CIA/Obama/Clinton could illegally funnel money to Iran and siphon off both money and uranium for nefarious purposes
And remember ...
- It takes only FOUR Supreme Court justices to agree to HEAR a case, not five.
- If the lawyers have the goods on Roberts, this could get reeeeeal interesting
Who exactly is this John here to help? He seems to have a lot of information about a wide range of topics. I’ve seen video of him talking about Roberts and his plot to kill Scalia, do a takeover coup of Trump, we have the FISA stuff, and I’ve also heard him talk about being a scientist working on project looking glass and the voice of God thing. Im just skeptical of a guy that claims to be a part of so much stuff. Maybe he could be, but it seems like there would be some sort of compartmentalization of secret government projects. Like I can see him being involved in one thing, but the other things he claims are in a completely different spectrum. How is being a scientist give him access to this information about Roberts and Pence, etc. Not trying to be a doomer, just playing devils advocate and if someone can connect those dots with information I haven’t seen I’d love to see it (that’s not sarcasm).
He called the fraud pretty extensively back in July:
https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1285607581315215363
He hit some of that stuff dead on, some of it not so much. But that’s not surprising, I wouldn’t expect anyone to be able to predict things 100% dead on. I’m not trying to discredit him, I just had red flags pop up when I see him talking about having inside knowledge to things that are completely unrelated. Like he said some people wanted him dead bc of his involvement in scientific research but others won’t let people kill him bc he’s the only one left that has the real knowledge behind everything. Like ok, I can buy that on its own. Then he also has a lot of inside knowledge on all this other stuff that’s not tied to that. He just seems to have his hands in a lot of different pots that could get him killed. I get concerned when someone claims to be involved in so much, if that makes sense. Not saying he’s not, just makes me wonder. And if one thing turns out to be not true, it’s hard to believe him on other claims. Again, I haven’t seen anything that says he’s lying about one thing or another, I just have my concerns about the scope of his knowledge.
Very legitimate concerns, especially across such a broad spectrum of things. I totally agree that it's important to verify or see some sort of evidence before being completely certain.
Thanks for not shitting on me for critical thinking fren hahaha