...and i wouldn't blindly trust a doctor. Mike Adams is brilliant for health matters and "killing cancer from the inside out" is one great source for cancer treatment through natural processes rather than poisonous medical cabal options like chemo
and i fully trust your gf and so many people like her mean well and believe they know but reality is they only know what they were taught and what that were taught was approved at the highest of levels and those people have an agenda that isn't one that's best for people who aren't of their ilk
it was only 5 year ago or so that i thought like you currently do
i don't blindly trust anything including my research or any particular person or news source, but for example I've been reading The Gateway Pundit for a few years now and they're very reliable, they even overtly retract a story on the occasion they get it wrong. this desire to do my own research on matters important to me and my family and friends still allows me to give certain people the benefit of the doubt if i haven't fully researched or it's not a matter that concerns me too much.
not sure why you default to being combative but it's not helpful to civil discourse. if you aren't here to wake up then why are you here? you're not going to get anyone on this site that's awakened to put their head back in the sand.
your gf and you certainly believe vaccines are safe and good i can tell from your admitted blind faith in the medical industry. correct me if I'm wrong, but I'd bet a good amount on this.
so let me start with a simple question and see if you'll answer and counter, if you wish, civilly and respectfully so we can maybe have a constructive debate. question: if a mother of a child and well educated doctors and nurses claim that the MMR vaccine is dangerous and has severely harmed their child and other children what is their motivation and what do they have to gain? when answering this you should keep in mind that there's a special "vaccine court" that the pharmas got to make them immune from any adverse impact claims anyone might make as a result of their vaccine, including death. while people can "win" in this court it's extremely difficult, expensive and the standard of proof if unmatched by other courts. when someone does "win" it's because they PROVED the vaccine without any doubt caused the harm. "reasonable doubt" or any other typical legal court term is irrelevant in this specialized unique court.
with the mother they often say their child was fine and the same day or within a day or 2 their child all of a sudden couldn't walk anymore, couldn't talk anymore, looked like a zombie with no awareness, assuming they didn't die which does happen to some. a mother is very in tune with this. how could we argue that the mother didn't notice the change? and how do mothers have the same story which they often don't realize because the media silences these stories to protect big pharma and others who have a massive financial and theological stake in it.
and then we still haven't answered why would reputable doctors and nurses and the like make these claims and hold these beliefs? it all but guarantees they'll be treated as a pariah in their industry.
if you search for videos of Robert Kennedy and also search bitchute for "Vaxxed" and "Vaxxed II" movies it will open some doors. if and when you start to believe that vaccines cause harm you should start wondering who is really behind this and what's the objective. it's not just about money and greed, but instead the money is secondary and purposeful to keep the objective theology snowball rolling
...and i wouldn't blindly trust a doctor. Mike Adams is brilliant for health matters and "killing cancer from the inside out" is one great source for cancer treatment through natural processes rather than poisonous medical cabal options like chemo
and i fully trust your gf and so many people like her mean well and believe they know but reality is they only know what they were taught and what that were taught was approved at the highest of levels and those people have an agenda that isn't one that's best for people who aren't of their ilk
it was only 5 year ago or so that i thought like you currently do
i don't blindly trust anything including my research or any particular person or news source, but for example I've been reading The Gateway Pundit for a few years now and they're very reliable, they even overtly retract a story on the occasion they get it wrong. this desire to do my own research on matters important to me and my family and friends still allows me to give certain people the benefit of the doubt if i haven't fully researched or it's not a matter that concerns me too much.
not sure why you default to being combative but it's not helpful to civil discourse. if you aren't here to wake up then why are you here? you're not going to get anyone on this site that's awakened to put their head back in the sand.
your gf and you certainly believe vaccines are safe and good i can tell from your admitted blind faith in the medical industry. correct me if I'm wrong, but I'd bet a good amount on this.
so let me start with a simple question and see if you'll answer and counter, if you wish, civilly and respectfully so we can maybe have a constructive debate. question: if a mother of a child and well educated doctors and nurses claim that the MMR vaccine is dangerous and has severely harmed their child and other children what is their motivation and what do they have to gain? when answering this you should keep in mind that there's a special "vaccine court" that the pharmas got to make them immune from any adverse impact claims anyone might make as a result of their vaccine, including death. while people can "win" in this court it's extremely difficult, expensive and the standard of proof if unmatched by other courts. when someone does "win" it's because they PROVED the vaccine without any doubt caused the harm. "reasonable doubt" or any other typical legal court term is irrelevant in this specialized unique court.
with the mother they often say their child was fine and the same day or within a day or 2 their child all of a sudden couldn't walk anymore, couldn't talk anymore, looked like a zombie with no awareness, assuming they didn't die which does happen to some. a mother is very in tune with this. how could we argue that the mother didn't notice the change? and how do mothers have the same story which they often don't realize because the media silences these stories to protect big pharma and others who have a massive financial and theological stake in it.
and then we still haven't answered why would reputable doctors and nurses and the like make these claims and hold these beliefs? it all but guarantees they'll be treated as a pariah in their industry.
if you search for videos of Robert Kennedy and also search bitchute for "Vaxxed" and "Vaxxed II" movies it will open some doors. if and when you start to believe that vaccines cause harm you should start wondering who is really behind this and what's the objective. it's not just about money and greed, but instead the money is secondary and purposeful to keep the objective theology snowball rolling