TL;DR: Bitcoin and other coins have nothing to do with Q. Q has never talked about them.
I have 7 years of experience in digital currencies. I remember back when Bitcoins were $100 each, and you could mine them with a simple video card. I've built my own mining warehouse for ETH back in 2018. In addition, I have held and traded various cryptocurrencies for years.
There's recently been a lot of debate on this forum on whether or not we can trust Bitcoin, who really controls cryptocurrencies, and whether or not we should buy them.
Proponents of Bitcoin have pointed out that Bitcoin and other coins are decentralized, minted/verified through Proof of Work (which guarantees all transactions are final), and the supply of new coins accumulates in a similar way to gold. The central banks cannot control these currencies, print more of them or even track us (especially with Monero).
Detractors of Bitcoin have argued that because big companies like VISA, Tesla, JPMorgan and Amazon are now accepting the coin and integrating it into their systems, we can't trust Bitcoin anymore. The central banks/Rothschilds/corporations can now track all transactions and associate it with our real names and bank account numbers. I've even heard the claim on this forum that the CIA helped start Bitcoin.
So which side stands to benefit from the current crypto rally? Is it Team Q and the patriots, or is it the Deep State banking cartel? Is Team Q pushing Bitcoin because it degrades the banking system, or is the Deep State pushing Bitcoin because they can gain power over our finances?
My answer is that cryptocurrencies are a tool that either side, or both sides, can use for their purposes. Both things can be true at once.
The recent push by the banking cartel for Bitcoin adoption could be the Deep State destroying themselves, because after all, the more people use crypto coins, the less they use the fiat dollar. The Federal Reserve loses power either way. Q might be behind the recent crypto rally because it's raising awareness about the weakness of the dollar. Crypto could be a gateway asset to those people owning gold/silver one day.
The recent Bitcoin hype could also be something Q doesn't like, especially VISA/JPMorgan connecting the cabal banking system to cryptocurrencies. Donald Trump stressed the importance of the U.S. dollar many times in the past.
My personal opinion is that by buying these coins, you're neither helping nor hurting the Deep State. Bitcoin is a tool/weapon for both sides to use against each other. Worry about what's best for your own financial situation, not the trolls/shills/hype bots.
Remember that Q has never used the words "bitcoin", "crypto" or "digital currency"!
I said nothing about whether cryptocurrencies have intrinsic value. I just argued that people who buy these coins are probably neither hurting nor helping Q, and I provided reasons for both Q and the Deep State to be benefitting from the recent crypto gold rush.
A secure medium of exchange is valuable by itself, regardless of any intrinsic value of the underlying unit, or lack thereof. I don't like bitcoin either, but blockchain is an excellent development.
The "Blockchain" part is what the big banks and cabal wants to exploit in order to bring the masses under their control even more than they already have with SWIFT and ACH.
The decentralization aspect of these coins is the #1 most important part.
I thought it was the digital aspect that gave them the power and control. The decentralization was the bait, making it less subject to manipulation (and making it a potential tool for any agenda simply because it's a more secure accounting).
The "bait" is when Visa/Goldman Sachs want you to register for their curated, tracked, monitored version of Bitcoin that collects your phone number, Social Security number and address.