Did anyone figure out what really happened to Diana and why? I saw the Q post that alluded to the fact that it wasn't an accident.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Hi, Phishhed44. You misunderstand my above post. The point of said post is that psychologist Julian Jaynes key insight in his book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976) is demonstrably correct. The Reptilians do actually exist in the subconscious (and sometimes conscious) minds of humans. I encountered one even though no psychological suggestion of the existence of such alien Reptilians had ever been imparted to me.
How does one know that such objects as hammers exist? If one has ever accidentally hit one's thumb with a hammer, I think in such an instance the hammer makes a rather convincing case for its existence. Likewise with the psychological Jaynesian gods of ye olden times, i.e., the aliens.
I can introduce you to the aliens/demons if you would like. About the worst that could happen is that you end up slaughtering your entire family and then killing yourself. But other than that, not much can go wrong.
Regarding demonology, I have with my "Societal Sadomasochism" article previously cited in this thread put it on a scientific footing. Rather than misguided Christians prattling on about unseen parallel spiritual realms/dimensions which apparently have their own peculiar laws of physics, yet somehow are able to interact with this world while leaving no lasting physical evidence, I have cast the phenomenon into the modern scientific language and while using phenomena which science already accepts as quite true. As it sounds like a phenomenon which has its locus and sphere of proximate influence in the brain. Said misguided Christians do great damage to Christianity in multiplying entities without necessity--i.e., these parallel spiritual realms--when they should be looking to cut out all unnecessary cruft from their philosophy, thereby strengthening it and making it sharp. By cruft, I don't mean diminishing the theology of Christianity, but rather using the latest science to explain it. And modern science is confirming the truth of Christianity in spades. Disconfirmability can indeed in particular instances have great value, since in prattling on about parallel spiritual realms which can neither be disproven or (immediately) proven to exist, there's no rational reason to accept these realms' existence. Yet demons and the spiritual realms can be proven to exist! The error many make is naïvely thinking that they understand the ontological nature of this phenomenon, and thereby proposing additional unnecessary entities to explain it. Many Christians--as with pretty much all people--have not yet learned the eternal value of Friar William of Ockham's epistemic razor.
As I pointed out in my "Societal Sadomasochism" article, one can actually contact these entities if one should doubt their existence. So something quite real is going on here. The issue is what is the actual ontological nature of the phenomenon. I gave the only explanation that actually matches all of the data; unless one posits the computer-simulation hypothesis--but that hypothesis has its own extreme failings.
And besides sharpening Christianity, I have in mind by putting demonology on a scientific footing other extremely practical matters. I would like actual scientific research conducted into this, both for reasons of Artificial Intelligence research and to better understand our own selves. As such research cannot help but to bear good fruit: if for no other reason than to understand ourselves better and what makes us tick. Surely in understanding ourselves better, that cannot but be of benefit to us.
⁂
I have made it as easy as possible for one to obtain veridical understanding into the most crucial fields of sapient knowledge via my own writings. My below articles explain to people (1) theological ethics and soteriology in a comprehensive and logically-coherent manner; (2) how the known laws of physics prove God's existence while demonstrating the exacting and extensive consilience of the New Testament with said physical laws; (3) the nature of God in light of said physical laws; (4) the End Time, the Tribulation, the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, the foundation of Heaven on Earth, and the universal resurrection of the dead in light of said physical laws; and (5) the End Time in light of the history of the globalist oligarchy's self-termed New World Order world government and world religion agenda.
Item No. 1 is important vis-à-vis salvation for those who maintain that they already believe in Jesus Christ's Godhead. Items Nos. 2-5 are important in letting atheists, believers in other religions, and nominal ersatz "Christians" know that God as described by the New Testament does exist and that the New Testament is true. Items Nos. 2-5 are additionally important in giving believers in Christ a much deeper understanding of God and of the End Time, so that they may be strengthened in their faith during the events to come.
My following articles distill all of the most important aspects of veridical human knowledge into a comprehensive, coherent and unified whole: from theology, physics, science, ethics, legal theory, political theory, economics, sociology, evolutionary psychology, epistemology to history.
James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , https://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .
James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", Pastebin.com, Apr. 18, 2019, https://pastebin.com/6bZDc7rB , https://archive.is/uHEyL , https://megalodon.jp/2019-0423-0435-52/pastebin.com/6bZDc7rB .
James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), 60 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, https://archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf , http://www.freezepage.com/1560442613QRSDHGPCAM , https://megalodon.jp/2019-0614-0116-58/archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf .
James Redford, "Libertarian Anarchism Is Apodictically Correct", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 15, 2011, 9 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1972733, https://archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf , http://www.freezepage.com/1560442546UTKUJCKYNM , https://megalodon.jp/2019-0614-0115-06/archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf .
James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Christian Forums, Apr. 19, 2019, https://archive.is/JPojL , https://megalodon.jp/2020-0325-0427-34/theophysics.freevar.com/christianforums.com-forums-general-political-discussion.450.html , https://web.archive.org/web/20200324192716/theophysics.freevar.com/christianforums.com-forums-general-political-discussion.450.html , http://www.freezepage.com/1585078048SAWDZFDONX .
James Redford, "How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud", Internet Archive, May 12, 2019, 6 pp., ark:/13960/t0tr3j398, https://archive.org/download/InfiniLastSex/Redford-InfiniLast-Sex-Technique.pdf , https://webcitation.org/78KGCK1s4 , https://megalodon.jp/2019-0513-0846-26/archive.org/download/InfiniLastSex/Redford-InfiniLast-Sex-Technique.pdf .