People know because there is an information war going on.
Are there any scientists that are incompetent? Absolutely, but not really that many. More likely any bad science comes from corrupted scientist (I know at least one personally) or a completely corrupted (and completely false) media interpretation.
Most (all?) of the actual bad science we are seeing comes from scientists that are forced or manipulated into giving false information. As a separate entity, we also see a media that gives false information on the science. I say "separate entity" not because there is no possible lines between them, but because the Luciferian owned media will ALWAYS report on the science with half-truth lies (or outright lies) whereas the science is actually only rarely fraudulent.
I know this because I am a scientist. When I see reports on things I go to the source papers and read them. Most of the science is not that bad. Some of the conclusions on the science are bad but the actual study itself is fine. These conclusions are not false information in and of themselves. However, even if not intentional, bad conclusions in science papers are a scientists opinions on the otherwise good science that the media can take and run with.
They're not incompetent, they're sinister.
They sure are evil. But if they weren't incompetent, nobody would know about what is going on.
People know because there is an information war going on.
Are there any scientists that are incompetent? Absolutely, but not really that many. More likely any bad science comes from corrupted scientist (I know at least one personally) or a completely corrupted (and completely false) media interpretation.
Most (all?) of the actual bad science we are seeing comes from scientists that are forced or manipulated into giving false information. As a separate entity, we also see a media that gives false information on the science. I say "separate entity" not because there is no possible lines between them, but because the Luciferian owned media will ALWAYS report on the science with half-truth lies (or outright lies) whereas the science is actually only rarely fraudulent.
I know this because I am a scientist. When I see reports on things I go to the source papers and read them. Most of the science is not that bad. Some of the conclusions on the science are bad but the actual study itself is fine. These conclusions are not false information in and of themselves. However, even if not intentional, bad conclusions in science papers are a scientists opinions on the otherwise good science that the media can take and run with.
Word.