I wanted to rewrite this post because my last one had a lot of on-the-fly edits and I think I can make this cleaner.
Here's what we should do:
-
Find people in your neighborhood/community who are sick of masks and want a change and invite them to participate. Start a facebook group or get people on a massive text chain or something like that.
-
Decide the dates and times you plan to do this. Get people to go in groups of at least 15, the bigger the better. That's disruptive, and frankly, people can go in all day in different shifts and keep it going.
-
Decide on the grocery store you wish to target.
-
Go in with masks on, grab a cart, and grab all the perishable goods (meat, cheese, milk, eggs, etc.) along with a few other things to make replacing things more time consuming.
-
Place your list with the demands on the top of the cart filled with items (it will say "replace your 'masks required signs' with a 'we support your constitutional rights--no masks required' signs and then these actions will stop.")
-
Walk your cart to the front of the store.
-
Leave it there and go home.
This way we:
-
Avoid physical confrontations
-
Avoid being identified so we can be charged with trespassing, etc.
-
Create real disruption for these business owners forcing them to change.
FBI would be only one of the possible orgs, yes.
Ok well. I guess you’re wrong then. Definitely not a Glowie!
I mean, would a glowie say anything else? ?
I doubt you're actually a glowie... just not thinking in terms of who this is intended to influence.vs annoy. Most of the people directly annoyed by this are probably supporters. But, the influence isn't targeted at them. It's at the levels measured on metrics that already annoy the same people you're trying to be polite to.
Wrong target.
I wasn’t trying to influence or annoy anybody. I was just making a comment. No target needed! Lol.
By annoy I mean "restocking a bunch of tiny stuff“ annoys the stocker, not the manager or the store.
The worker might be annoyed, but their individual annoyance wont change policy or approach.
The “annoyance“ has to be at the $$ impact, not the “Eff this“ worker level.
Not that you're trying to annoy, for clarity.