No it isn’t. It still legalizes murder. Abortion is murder. It’s a proven scientific fact that a new human organism is created at conception.
That's not true. At conception the organism lacks every single trait that would qualify one as human.
Either you believe all human organisms are created with equal inherent rights, or you believe our rights are merely arbitrarily granted by whoever happens to be in power over us based on arbitrary criteria such as race, gender, age, location, mental/physical abilities, etc.
How about option 3 - All human beings have equal rights.
I don't consider a collection of DNA and chromosomes to be a human being even if it has to potential to be one.
As for exceptions, there are none that should be tolerated. No child deserves the death penalty for the crimes of their rapist father.
It's not a child at 3 weeks.
Also, killing your preborn son/daughter because your health is at risk is like murdering your teenage son/daughter because you need to harvest their organs for a transplant to save your life.
Wrong. Science has disproven your personal opinion. “Human” refers to our species, which is defined by our DNA. There’s a biological definition of “organism” that has several criteria, and human zygotes are confirmed with technology such as electron microscopes to be human organisms.
If we go by random opinions about what a human being is instead of the scientific definition, then people like you could once again argue that blacks or Jews are not actual human beings just like some currently do for preborn human organisms.
Wrong. Science has disproven your personal opinion.
No it hasn't. Stop lying.
“Human” refers to our species, which is defined by our DNA. There’s a biological definition of “organism” that has several criteria, and human zygotes are confirmed with technology such as electron microscopes to be human organisms.
Human being actually.
Everytime you remove a part of your body that contains your DNA you aren't destroying a unique entity, are you?
That which makes people.....people...is more than a genetic series of codecs. Humans form into beings, which is why you aren't automatically a person upon conception.
If we go by random opinions about what a human being is instead of the scientific definition,
I didn't say human, you did.
I said human being.
Pay attention.
then people like you could once again argue that blacks or Jews are not actual human beings just like some currently do for preborn human organisms.
You're an idiot. Nothing that has been said separates race from humanity.
Also, learn some basic high school biology. Learn the difference between an organism (a living being) vs a living cell, such as a skin cell, that is a part of an organism.
“Being” simply means state of existence. Human organisms are synonymous with human beings.
Nothing there is proven. It is simply an account of the stages of formation, but does not prove a collection of genetic material = a person.
I already knew this.
Also, learn some basic high school biology. Learn the difference between an organism (a living being) vs a living cell, such as a skin cell, that is a part of an organism.
You can clone a person from a cell but a cell isn't a person.
Learn some real biology. An "organism" is nothing more than a collection of relevant information that develops into a person. Once a person is developed you have a human being, not before. Until then it's just information that has no unique identifiers that we consider "human". Heartbeat, brain activity, etc.
“Being” simply means state of existence.
Yes, that's the point that you keep missing.
Human organisms are synonymous with human beings.
No they aren't. They are two distinct stages of development.
“Human” refers to our species, which is defined by our DNA.
Humans and chimps share a surprising 98.8 percent of their DNA. What so the last 1.2% defines what a human being is? You believe in the old determinism science but we have moved on from that old system more than hundred years ago. We know that more than classical mechanism operates in this physical realm, which science moved on when they discovered quantum physics. The conclusion is a human beings have a non-physical soul. Only evil people believes human beings are just a body with no soul. It is the soul that defines the human being with abilities to think rational and logical. If we were just a body clipping or nails and hair would be equal to torture because then we would lose parts of ourself, but it is the soul that is us, living in the host of our body in this physical realm. A soul can't be divided into pieces, we are whole.
That's not true. At conception the organism lacks every single trait that would qualify one as human.
How about option 3 - All human beings have equal rights.
I don't consider a collection of DNA and chromosomes to be a human being even if it has to potential to be one.
It's not a child at 3 weeks.
Uh...what?
Wrong. Science has disproven your personal opinion. “Human” refers to our species, which is defined by our DNA. There’s a biological definition of “organism” that has several criteria, and human zygotes are confirmed with technology such as electron microscopes to be human organisms.
If we go by random opinions about what a human being is instead of the scientific definition, then people like you could once again argue that blacks or Jews are not actual human beings just like some currently do for preborn human organisms.
No it hasn't. Stop lying.
Human being actually.
Everytime you remove a part of your body that contains your DNA you aren't destroying a unique entity, are you?
That which makes people.....people...is more than a genetic series of codecs. Humans form into beings, which is why you aren't automatically a person upon conception.
I didn't say human, you did.
I said human being.
Pay attention.
You're an idiot. Nothing that has been said separates race from humanity.
Here’s a long list of scientific references that prove you wrong. https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html
Also, learn some basic high school biology. Learn the difference between an organism (a living being) vs a living cell, such as a skin cell, that is a part of an organism.
“Being” simply means state of existence. Human organisms are synonymous with human beings.
Nothing there is proven. It is simply an account of the stages of formation, but does not prove a collection of genetic material = a person.
I already knew this.
You can clone a person from a cell but a cell isn't a person.
Learn some real biology. An "organism" is nothing more than a collection of relevant information that develops into a person. Once a person is developed you have a human being, not before. Until then it's just information that has no unique identifiers that we consider "human". Heartbeat, brain activity, etc.
Yes, that's the point that you keep missing.
No they aren't. They are two distinct stages of development.
Yes, learn some basic biology. Species are determined by our DNA.
Also, I never said human beings don’t have souls. Quit assuming things and putting words in my mouth.
The body is, not the soul. If the body was all we are then we would be practical apes since the DNA is almost 100% the same.
But Wikipedia says....