BREAKING: South Carolina passes bill that bans nearly all abortions.
(media.greatawakening.win)
WINS OF THE DAY
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (131)
sorted by:
The safety of the murderer and their accomplices is irrelevant to the fact that abortion is murder. They are not the victims here and deserve no safety. Also, all the stats that originated from Roe v Wade regarding abortions and dangerous back alley abortions were all lies. Also, many women get killed or severely injured during the “safe” abortions in clinics too.
Again, that’s all irrelevant to the fact that abortion is murder and no situation can justify it.
Extremist viewpoints are seldom persuasive.
Almost nobody believes women and girls should be charged with murder for terminating a pregnancy, or forced against her will to carry to term the fetus of her rapist or family member. It's just not a rational position. I understand that you believe it is, so we agree to disagree.
It doesn’t matter what the majority believes, whether the majority support communism, or support exterminating Jews, or support slavery.
Also, no child deserves the death penalty for the crimes of their rapist father, and no girl deserves the trauma of abortion/murdering their child on top of their trauma from rape.
You’re only agreeing with murderers that murder is okay when it’s perceived to be convenient and the victims the defenseless and out of sight.
Who granted you the sweeping power to decide for all girls that they must carry their rapist's seed to term, and then suffer the horrible pain of childbirth on top of the horrible pain of being raped? Or that the pain/trauma of surrendering their baby to someone else is worse than abortion? Or that the pain of childbirth is somehow preferable for her to the pain/trauma of the procedure? Answer is nobody.
So now you're NOT charging minors with murder if they have an abortion after being raped? OK
Sure. You're getting more bizarre and absurd with every post. You should have stopped at "We agree to disagree" LOL
Nothing in your first paragraph is relevant when your answer to all of it is to allow the murder of an innocent child. That's a complete non-starter.
It’s not “seed”, it’s a living human organism/being with equal inherent/natural rights. Murder is always wrong, and preborn human beings are always 100% innocent. These are irrefutable facts.
Sounds like you're saying "Abortion is murder; so we should TRY these females and give them the death penalty for first degree murder", and that marching long lines of girls and women to the gallows is a good solution.
Exaggerated for effect, but is that essentially accurate?
I’m not making any argument about what consequences should be given, just that abortion is murder. If a mother rapes her child, or murders their child, harsh consequences should be given either way.
Sorry, but your declaration doesn't come with that escape hatch.
If you're going to proclaim something as murder, then you have to also man up and be consistent in meting out the punishment for it as murder.
Can you not read? I said consequences for murder should be given. I just didn’t give specifics. I oppose the death penalty, which is what you proposed.