Well, banning acronyms would be limiting free speech and I know you're joking but I'm in total agreement with you about having to look them up. If we're trying to red pill people and normies come here, they have to do the same and I think it hurts getting them to go further. It's inefficient to learn more.
Maybe it helps getting their curiosity going and they research like Q wants us to. Still, I would like them to be used less as it would help our cause. Even when I read a drop, sometimes I forget an acronym Q has used over and over. I noticed SA gets people confused on boards. So less usage I think would be good. For me, acronyms are for for experts (military) in a group that use the phrase all the time and need to speed communications up.
I saw somewhere else: "What does water have on either side?"
BANKS
Just FFT.
There you go
(Food for thought) - sorry.
Well, banning acronyms would be limiting free speech and I know you're joking but I'm in total agreement with you about having to look them up. If we're trying to red pill people and normies come here, they have to do the same and I think it hurts getting them to go further. It's inefficient to learn more.
Maybe it helps getting their curiosity going and they research like Q wants us to. Still, I would like them to be used less as it would help our cause. Even when I read a drop, sometimes I forget an acronym Q has used over and over. I noticed SA gets people confused on boards. So less usage I think would be good. For me, acronyms are for for experts (military) in a group that use the phrase all the time and need to speed communications up.
What did you find??? Now I’m curious.