Why would President Trump initiate Operation Warp Speed to bring about a vaccine that some are calling dangerous and others are prepared to use as a weapon against our civil liberties (mandatory vaccination)? My left brain says don't get the vaccine, we don't know enough about it yet. My right brain says my President brought us the vaccine to help get things back to normal so it must be ok. Before the election the democrats were against vaccination. This told me that it must be good. After the stolen election, democrats are pushing the vaccine. This tells me it's bad. I've read a lot of opinions for and against the vaccine. My daughter and SIL both had the vaccine for work...I worry about them. Can someone explain how Operation Warp Speed fits into the plan?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (154)
sorted by:
My impression is that he wanted to remove the Dems excuses to remain locked down by providing a vaccine.
Now if the vaccines is the mark of the beast or some other nefarious thing I don't see it as Trump's fault. Remember vaccines do work and have been good for humanity. It's just that in recent years big pharma has been using them as a money making scheme.
Anyway the plan and the vaccine are not related. The plan doesn't cover all possibilities. There is also the possibility that if Trump is part of the plan that he isn't THE PLAN, ie: the plan goes beyond him.
Let's not forget that, folks! Not EVERY activity in life is a plot to subvert humanity!
With cancer rates sky-rocketing and us being the most vaccinated people in history... how in the actual fuck can you possibly say such a thing?
Is it not possible vaccines can lead to terminal illeness 10, 20,30,40 and even 50 years down the road? If not, please point me to that study... You likely won't find one because the vaccine manufactures don't want to know the answer to those questions.
That's a great observation, and I'd love to see serious studies on it. But let's look at a few obvious facts. We are the most vaccinated people in history because it's a relatively new technology; vaccines have only been around for 200 years (that's basically 2 generations). We're the most 'social media savvy people in history', the most 'car obsessed people in history', the most travelled people in history' ... etc. etc.
So increases in cancer could be related to that, or, the pollutants from the industrial revolution, or the effects of a highly processed food diet (junk food), or the most irradiated people in history (radio waves), or any one of hundreds of factors that are associated with modern life.
Further - cancer was not KNOWN (measurable / detected) beyond last 200 years (yes, there's some historic reference to it but no one really knew how to really detect or measure it).
So "how in the actual fuck" (to coin your phrase) can you possibly say cancer is definitively related to vaccines?
Vaccines are virtually required for kids to attend public school. Vaccines have been the cause of a lot of human tragedy that still seems to be unmeasureable. For me, I can't get on board with the idea that they're a net positive for humanity... That's a leap of faith imo.