BREAKING: BIDEN Just Told The Government To TAKE OVER Christianity In America
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Vatican isn't your problem, Protestantism and Freemasonry and Kabbalistic Jews are.
The Vatican was infiltrated by these groups some time ago.
The Catholics are the reason you even have a Bible in your hands. Martin Luther and other heretics messed with the Bible and removed parts...down to 66 books. What an interesting number.
It was Martin Luther and the other reformers who wanted the Bible to go to everyone in their own language instead of only being in Latin.
No, Martin Luther wanted people to have HIS VERSION of the Bible.
He was tricked by the Jews. Read the book he wrote at the end of his life.
Cope harder! Way to go helping the anti-Jesus Freemasonic agenda.
So a man who is anti-Catholic infiltrates the Vatican, gets his buddies in, fills the ranks with anti-Catholic men (Freemasons, Qabbalists, homosexuals, abortionists, etc)...
And you want to help them finish off what they started? You're working FOR the Freemasonic order. Great job.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtKxMklQeXblEcia__pQt7psDuMRc2sA
The Vatican belongs to God, not the Khazarian Mafia. If an enemy conquers your church or home, do I burn your church down? What does that do? The Khazarian Mafia is still the problem. A building is where they hide.
Deal me in, simple bitch. How am I still asleep?
There is a person sometimes called “the black pope,” but his existence is not a secret and he does not have anywhere near as much power as the real pope. “The black pope” is a nickname given to the Father General of the Society of Jesus. When the Jesuits were the most prestigious, influential missionary order in the world, the people of Rome began to speak jokingly of their head as a second pope. They called him “the black pope” because he wore the Jesuits’ black clerical garb, in contrast to the real pope, who wore white and became known as “the white pope.”
“The black pope” does not have authority over anyone but Jesuits. Sometimes people point to him as evidence of a conspiracy in the Vatican, but what they really have is a garbled understanding of a Catholic in-joke.
The people who have a problem with the Jesuits were the theosophists (read as: Qabballah, Jewish mysticism, Rosicrucianism), Freemasons and the Nazis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZrJYyhYk9s&list=PLOtKxMklQeXblEcia__pQt7psDuMRc2sA&index=7
Which one are you?
Or are you going to feign ignorance?
Careful what you believe from the internet.
That's what I wrote.
What makes him an asshole?
The Jesuits were an anti-Communist order.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Is being anti-Communist a bad thing? If yes, hello Rofschild. Satan doesn't have any other busywork for you?
lol internet "truth" about the Catholic church? Basic bitch shit.
The Pope's hat (bishops wear similar - they're called mitres) are based on those of the priests in the Temple in Jerusalem, not on any pagan deity.
Twisting scripture? Come ooooooon. How much time did you actually spend reading that chapter for yourself instead of leaning on the understanding of some bunk internet "truther" "Christian" website?
(Certainly Christians agree that Jesus’ prohibition against calling anyone “father” does not preclude the honor due to natural parents, living or dead, even though that could be taken as the literal meaning of his command, though not even the most literalistic Fundamentalist takes it that way.)
Those Christians who are troubled by the title “father” being given to Catholic priests say it is an honorific that belongs only to human parents or to God, not to religious leaders. This objection can be answered from the Bible: We have six New Testament books which show us that Jewish or Christian leaders may be addressed by this title.
Nearly half the uses of “father” in the Acts of the Apostles appear in Stephen’s speech in chapter 7 (17 out of 36 uses). He refers to the ancestors as fathers, both individually and collectively (16 times), and once he addresses his audience as “brothers and fathers.” Paul addressed a crowd of angry Jews in the Temple as “brothers and fathers” (Acts 22:1). These are places in which “father” is given to Jewish religious leaders. The title is also given to Christian religious leaders.
The first New Testament book ever written, 1 Thessalonians, refers to Paul “as a father exhorting his own children” (1 Thess. 2:11). By this usage Paul places himself in the role of a spiritual father. In fact, he insists on being called the spiritual father of the Corinthians when he says, “You have in Christ ten thousand teachers, but not many fathers, because in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through announcing the gospel. Therefore I exhort you to become imitators of me” (1 Cor. 4:15).
More here: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/call-no-man-father-0
Easy to fool. Not well educated on logic. Perfect target for manipulation.
And this negates the truth how? This negates Catholic dogma how? It was infiltrated by evil men and that proves what? Judas was one of the Apostles. One of the twelve dimed Jesus out for money and then killed himself. One of the men CLOSEST TO JESUS...and you think the church Jesus established is somehow immune from infiltration by evil men?
You don't care but you should. Your salvation depends on it. That's why I bother to take the time. This is about you hearing the truth. You are free to reject it but I am not free to stay silent when someone is dead wrong about such things.
Godspeed.
So then your problem isn't the Jesuits, its the group that infiltrates anti-Communist orders like the Jesuits. That's what I'm pointing your attention to. You have the wrong "bad guy" and you have all the knowledge necessary to understand that. "The Jesuits" is a Freemasonic boogeyman. It's Freemasonic propaganda along with other things like "the dark ages".
I watched it.
She references Alberto Rivera as her source for part of the Jesuit garbage.
Alberto Rivera, the alleged former Catholic priest, bishop, and anti-Catholic hero of Jack Chick comic strips, was exposed as a total fraud by non-Catholic (evangelical Protestant) Gary Metz, in two articles appearing in evangelical magazines:
Thanks but that series is FULL of anti-Catholic propaganda. Do you know who comes up with the anti-Catholic propaganda? THE SAME PEOPLE YOU CLAIM TO RAGE AGAINST.
You are stuck in a Hegalian dialectic that will cause constant revolution, loss, suffering and disease.
YOU need to wake up.
The levels of cognitive dissonance are astounding.
The Jesuits are an anti-Communist order and are have at times been the target of the theosophists. The Jesuits as a whole are not your problem. You NEED them to be your problem because you don't want to admit this information is gatekept heavily and that you're repeating Freemasonic propaganda. That is what currently runs the MSM and the Vatican bank, etc. The Vatican and Jesuits as institutions are not the problem, its the infiltrators and are also in charge of the USA government.