Okay, again forgive my misguesses when I and the people I "don't understand" have difficulty communicating with each other. I guess you mean the human trafficking is a totally different issue than that other one I've seen, the diminution of white percentage in Western Europe and the stated goal to diminish white percentage in America (which I've always considered farcical and which does not seem a Q topic).
I affirm your Scriptures and generally your history, but again in these matters sketchiness is no virtue. I would've thought I could get data on white population of Western Europe easily, but my searches didn't work that well and I got much more generic statements like "Europe is increasingly a region marked by cultural diversity and foreign-born populations" (Pew 2016). You'll note the difference between restraint and absolutism.
If I widen my search to the untrustworthy "The Guardian", I get the much more direct claim (2000) that "72 per cent of the US population is non-hispanic whites; the US Census Bureau predicts they will become a minority between 2055 and 2060". This is more to the point and has often been in the background of news, but that's why our correct response is to build our families and network our faith within this 60-year window, not to complain about "anti-racists". This is a simple matter of God having a better plan than the devil and the result being determined by how well our generation's righteousness exalts us. If we've survived as a melting pot many more years than this "genocide" movement has been attacking us, we should have means to handle immigration as well as we always have (and if Q is right we will use those means).
The Bible often speaks very strongly against intermarriage (e.g. Solomon), but sometimes it gives an undercurrent of acceptance (e.g. Gibeon). The resolution is that intermarriage must be accompanied by full conversion (e.g. Ruth) and not by fiction (e.g. Shechem) or by refusal even to learn the language (e.g. Nehemiah). The mixed multitude is always with us and we are responsible for training them into true belief in God (and I understand whites are quite a minority among the true worldwide believers in God, compared to the Asian churches thriving under persecution). Given all that, if a population deliberately attempts to infiltrate another for the purpose of weakening the other's culture, that is an act of undeclared war. However, I respect the word "genocide" too much to include mere infiltration within it (infiltration is a different war phase than destruction), and I respect the word "anti-racism" too much to include racism within it. I know there are Q posts about race and I'll review them in this light.
Okay, again forgive my misguesses when I and the people I "don't understand" have difficulty communicating with each other. I guess you mean the human trafficking is a totally different issue than that other one I've seen, the diminution of white percentage in Western Europe and the stated goal to diminish white percentage in America (which I've always considered farcical and which does not seem a Q topic).
I affirm your Scriptures and generally your history, but again in these matters sketchiness is no virtue. I would've thought I could get data on white population of Western Europe easily, but my searches didn't work that well and I got much more generic statements like "Europe is increasingly a region marked by cultural diversity and foreign-born populations" (Pew 2016). You'll note the difference between restraint and absolutism.
If I widen my search to the untrustworthy "The Guardian", I get the much more direct claim (2000) that "72 per cent of the US population is non-hispanic whites; the US Census Bureau predicts they will become a minority between 2055 and 2060". This is more to the point and has often been in the background of news, but that's why our correct response is to build our families and network our faith within this 60-year window, not to complain about "anti-racists". This is a simple matter of God having a better plan than the devil and the result being determined by how well our generation's righteousness exalts us. If we've survived as a melting pot many more years than this "genocide" movement has been attacking us, we should have means to handle immigration as well as we always have (and if Q is right we will use those means).
The Bible often speaks very strongly against intermarriage (e.g. Solomon), but sometimes it gives an undercurrent of acceptance (e.g. Gibeon). The resolution is that intermarriage must be accompanied by full conversion (e.g. Ruth) and not by fiction (e.g. Shechem) or by refusal even to learn the language (e.g. Nehemiah). The mixed multitude is always with us and we are responsible for training them into true belief in God (and I understand whites are quite a minority among the true worldwide believers in God, compared to the Asian churches thriving under persecution). Given all that, if a population deliberately attempts to infiltrate another for the purpose of weakening the other's culture, that is an act of undeclared war. However, I respect the word "genocide" too much to include mere infiltration within it (infiltration is a different war phase than destruction), and I respect the word "anti-racism" too much to include racism within it. I know there are Q posts about race and I'll review them in this light.