Steganography Test (password is lowercase)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
So look for a "fat" .png? Wouldn't regular .png have a predictible size for dimensions? As opposed to some complex .tif or other format that could have layers and masks?
That is not a format I ever worked with except to convert it, thanks for the info. I was remembering some project of setting up graphics that had to be .tiff and noticing that parts would get huge in a hurry but it was no problem so I never thought about the math of size increase. Now I think there is a lot of information that might at least be inferred.
I tried the flag png with SilentEye and didn't find anything, either. I also tried the test at the top of this thread and found nothing. That being said, I don't know whether I'm doing this right or not.
Tried pixelknot and it failed immediately, didn't spend the usual minute or so spinning. The low res space force pic did the same thing, no idea if that implies anything, besides maybe that pixelknot wasn't used on that image.
I tried pixelknot on two test pics, a jpg and a webp, and they both ended up with the same header showing up in "strings" output. Yours doesn't have that, you commented below here saying you used openstego for this image.
Have you checked the SF pic with openstego at all? Does it take the same amount of time to fail on a wrong password, as on a pic that doesn't have a message in it?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRZmklCU/x/c/4Dx5ap3RTgW