-1
Qlueless -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's because it went through OCR when being compressed into a PDF. The whole point of a PDF is to compress data and make it searchable. You're not adding anything new.

I remember their campaign did release a demonstrable fake weeks before the alleged fake.

2
Qlueless 2 points ago +2 / -0

It says no change in rate, not that it isn't warming.

(Also that does not imply humans as the cause.)

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump, doing the jobs Kamala would never do.

2
Qlueless 2 points ago +2 / -0

Double edge sword.

Tells them how much they need to cheat.

Prevents them from casting your vote for you before you get to the polls.

0
Qlueless 0 points ago +1 / -1

The scanned image will render a perfectly filled in box making it impossible to know if a human actually filled it in.

-1
Qlueless -1 points ago +1 / -2

As stated in the video, go outside the bounding box.

Also I would write in a candidate in an inconsequential race. It can be something unique or a candidate listed above.

If ballot images are released it will help prove your ballot was scanned and not scanned more than once.

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I already learned that yesterday. It doesn't make him more credible.

4
Qlueless 4 points ago +5 / -1

https://geneho.com/editor-in-chief/

I'm not particularly impressed with his photography. You'd think he wouldn't have so much noise in his self portrait.

also this was posted before

https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKe7Sxwi/q-clock-ends-529-and-check-out-t/c/

6
Qlueless 6 points ago +7 / -1

George ceased to be in 2001. There is no magazine being printed. There is only cheesy merchandise for purchase on a website that couldn't purchase george.com.

edit: look at that quality construction with a superimposed george logo. 🙄

https://georgemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/5873564458673928650_2048.jpeg

5
Qlueless 5 points ago +5 / -0

The thermal print out next to the screen. Like a grocery receipt.

When they audit elections they just look at the tally tape and don't actually look at the ballots. That's how they got away with the rigging while claiming they did an audit.

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +3 / -0

In an inconsequential race or races with no opponent, write in something unique.

You can even write in the listed candidate if you have no other option.

If they scan stacks of ballots multiple times that will make yours stand out.

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

The best way to expose election fraud would be to inject very fake ballots with only a single vote for the presidential candidate so it couldn't be contested and mix them in with the other fake ballots. Something like 450k fake ballots. When they count them you can expose them in a RICO operation. Sadly such an operation would never happen...

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +3 / -0

You mean they didn't do that in 2020?

"In September 2020, Scientific American announced its endorsement of vice president Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election,[14] breaking, as the media noted, a 175-year tradition of never having endorsed a presidential candidate."

Also it's a magazine, it never had any credibility.

6
Qlueless 6 points ago +6 / -0

We know how per capita works.

We also know they're under reporting violent crimes.

view more: Next ›