1 28-Oct-2017 1:44:28 PM PDT 4ch/pol
147005381 HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.
Q drop 1 does not 'make sense' because Q does not tell us the future. He tells us that future proves past. He claimed on 10/28 that HRC would be essentially caught on 10/30. This did not have any "proof" if the real world. Again, We know that future proves past. My theory is that if you look at the date 10/30 backwards, the date becomes 03/01. March 1st. Call me a datefag but my theory is that going all the way back to the beginning, Qdrop #1, may be important. 03/01, the beginning of the storm? There may be a significant purpose for the first Qdrop to be what it was. At least in my eyes.
In Q drop 2, Q claimed that HRC was detained, but not arrested (yet).
Didn’t say she wanted a deal? No deals. Does that fit here?