Article's source of the fionachen site appears to be bunk, numerous pages give this error in Chrome:
"Deceptive site ahead
Attackers on www.fionachen.com may trick you into doing something dangerous like installing software or revealing your personal information (for example, passwords, phone numbers, or credit cards). Learn more"
This to me does not lend credibility to a site, especially as a news source for the article of topic. I for one don't just go believing everything on the internet and am fine casting doubt on something where I think there is cause, better to err on the side of caution.
Article's source of the fionachen site appears to be bunk, numerous pages give this error in Chrome:
"Deceptive site ahead Attackers on www.fionachen.com may trick you into doing something dangerous like installing software or revealing your personal information (for example, passwords, phone numbers, or credit cards). Learn more"
Uh oh.
ICANN info does have a listing and it comes back to an Illinois company using a service called CPASiteSolutions for its name servers.
Also the email to report junk email, spoofiing and other matters is listed : [email protected]
Registry Expiration: 2028-12-11 19:46:41 UTC Created: 2008-12-11 19:46:41 UTC
Address info for billing, admin. not public.
“Mailing Address: Illinois, United States Redacted for privacy: some of the data in this object has been removed.”
The site’s about page contains some Fiona Chen bio. She’s a former IRS agent and the firm specializes in tax and forensic accounting.
She was educated in Taiwan.They’re not generally big fans of the ChiComs in that neck of the woods.
Hey, it may be legit, but last time I've been to any major American website and got the dangerous warning? Never.
So you can tout all the crap you want, but none the less, there is something peculiar about the site.
Tell me what you get on these links:
https://www.fionachen.com/newsletter.php#4
http://www.fionachen.com/newsletter.php#1
This to me does not lend credibility to a site, especially as a news source for the article of topic. I for one don't just go believing everything on the internet and am fine casting doubt on something where I think there is cause, better to err on the side of caution.