3
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sez Grok for those (like me) whose became immediately lost in the legalese:

Simplified facts from the post:

The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the State of Oregon to respond to a petition (docket 25-1280) in a case challenging a state requirement that healthcare professionals (e.g., nurses) be injected with an investigational/experimental drug (COVID-19 vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization) and waive rights to sue for injuries, as a condition of keeping their professional license to work.

Key elements of the legal question presented (from the petition):

  • Does the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment (considering precedents like Jacobson v. Massachusetts(1905) on public health measures, Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010), and Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) on property rights in employment/licensure) prohibit a state from conditioning the right to work in a licensed profession on taking an investigational drug and waiving the right to seek court remedies for resulting injuries?

The post argues:

  • Oregon (and the 9th Circuit) overreached by claiming a state right to mandate such drugs, which allegedly violates federal law.

  • COVID-19 vaccines were under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or similar investigational status, with liability shields (e.g., PREP Act).

  • This implicates broader issues like informed consent, federal preemption over investigational products, and whether states can override federal protections for experimental drugs.

The Supreme Court requesting a response is described as a rare/significant step, potentially signaling interest in the case.

Brief context for law-abiding U.S. citizens:

This could be important because it tests the limits of government power to impose medical mandates tied to livelihood, especially for products with liability protections and limited testing/consent requirements during emergencies.

A ruling could:

  • Reinforce individual rights to bodily autonomy and informed consent (e.g., refusing experimental products without losing one's job or license).

  • Clarify boundaries between state public health authority and federal rules on investigational drugs/EUA.

  • Affect future pandemic responses, professional licensing, and accountability for mandates — protecting citizens from compelled medical interventions that carry risks, while balancing public health needs.

It may open avenues for challenges to past mandates or set precedents limiting overreach, though outcomes depend on the Court's eventual decision (this is still at the petition/response stage).

Always consult legal experts for personal situations.

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was going to crack that since it is appearing over said sh——r, that it is obviously noxious cartoon-style vapor fumes emanating from a human source… possibly Eric Swalwell..

4
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 4 points ago +4 / -0

They’re gonna be on a wanted poster at the post office some day:

GOP Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Thom Tillis, Mitch McConnell

2
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like one of those coastal cities run by the coastal elite who always know oh so much better than us commoners (and are not shy about letting you know it).

Know of one where the old timers decades ago once said their town used to be really nice before the university was built. Common sense council members then gave way to “progressives,” socialists, avowed communists even…

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe when he posts a snap of one where he cuts dey haids off, it means Valerie Jarrett is…

2
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is excellent point and good catch.

Brandon WAS an FV, but on such a crucial piece of evidence, exaggerating, misrepresenting the document is inexcusable.

Using the actual words “campaign” presents potential line of defense, but still not a good look.

Intel community needs to take a seat…

Maybe regain credibility in, say, a century of just doing their effin’ jobs. When it comes to possessing any special insight into political campaigns, former “Intelligence Community” members need to have a nice hot cup of shut the F up.

Behavior looks like “true believers” and “fellow travelers” to be sure.

4
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 4 points ago +4 / -0

If true, Missouri is “stuck” with Hawley until 2031. (2030 election cycle).

https://www.senate.gov/senators/Class_I.htm#:~:text=Senators%20in%20Class%20I%20were,Democrats

The “Big Club” intentionally selected someone who was just beginning their 6-year US Senate term because the RINO leadership has seen what’s happening in the elections, knows how hacked off people are and that more constituents are undergoing the “Great Awakening.”

Plus they’re all scared little girls and obviously have special deep, dark shames (leverage) that the Swamp Creatures of DC hold over them.

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone from the great state of Kentucky care to weigh in?

Grokipedia verifies the party switch from Republican to Indy.

https://grokipedia.com/page/ed-gallrein

But also notes Gallrein states he voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 and that he could never vote for a Democrat.

Fifth generation farmer, so has the means to continue foisting himself upon the electorate there. Compared to Massie, the Devil you do know, he can’t possibly be any worse, and would owe much to the Trump administration for supporting his run for the seat.

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, smacks of desperation.

Just look around the world at the Ls this ideology is taking because people are waking up.

It’s scared.

4
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 4 points ago +4 / -0

Would guess intel knows because they’ve already examined what they’ve been able to obtain from their “channels.”

Needs to be forensically proven in a public, open fashion because if true, it’s damning proof and anyone involved should swing…

3
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gallegos former House member in Arizona —- voter fraud central — District 7 —parts of Phoenix, Glendale, and Tolleson

Columbia-American.

Former Marine.

Wonder who he crossed?

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thot it would be “go to ‘No Kings’ rally”

31
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 31 points ago +31 / -0

Truly the People’s President.

Reminds of an old saying:

“It’s nice to be important. But it’s more important to be nice.”*

*Apparently evolved after columnist Walter Winchell in the late 1930s wrote:

“It is swell to be important but it is much more important to be swell.”

At least that’s according to: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/04/12/nice/

8
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 8 points ago +8 / -0

Acting disorderly like that dishonors the uniform and the branch of the military it represents.

Pray the man does get the help he needs.

All the dollars this country throws at “mental health” these days and this is the return on that investment.

Disgraceful.

1
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reads like a rage post by someone who got their a— handed to ‘em in the primaries…

view more: Next ›