there's a theory that's been out for years that I prescribe to that there have been multiple Q teams posting with a team never returning after leaving. it is easy to see there are different styles and levels of cryptic speak less and less so as time went on. I do think everyone is Military and pushing forward the same plan.
This is important to establish for textual chain of custody. I think there are a couple times where Q confirms an anon list of prior posts, but I haven't seen it laid out in detail and that's worth someone researching and finalizing.
I'm pretty new to this whole thing as well. I can't remember if this video 100% answer your question, but I do know it goes into a lot of details about the trip codes:
For me the proof was in the pudding. The first 200 or so posts were describing the Saudi connection to Obama and Clinton, culminating in the Saudi Royal purge, exactly the day HRC/Podesta etc were supposed to be purged. Q later explains that this is a mirror - what happens here happens in middle east first (and then europe, asia etc). And, the whole HRC angle was a red herring to throw the deep state off the track of what was going on in SA.
Honestly, this is one of the finest proofs and actual "prediction". So it does not matter who was posting, they are legit, because they posted such high quality drops.
Good question. Post-tripcode its easy if you accept the notion that the trip cant easily be reverse engineered, but what about before this was used?
The post ID is a session-specific identifier I think - within a thread they should tie the origin of the posts to the same person and/or device, but in other threads? On other days? What if you reboot and try and post again in the same thread, has your ID changed? I dont know enough about how the post IDs function or are generated.
Bottom line, I think its mostly speculation that those early posts are Qs, since I cant see any hard designation that was quoted or sourced from anywhere. Just like if someone with very specific niche expertise posted a deal of advanced info on some obscure topic, and then a similar post was made a couple weeks later. Guesswork... even if they say 'i was the person who posted on this topic previously' that's no assurance of anything.
there's a theory that's been out for years that I prescribe to that there have been multiple Q teams posting with a team never returning after leaving. it is easy to see there are different styles and levels of cryptic speak less and less so as time went on. I do think everyone is Military and pushing forward the same plan.
As I recall, it was "less than 10". So definitely not 10.
This is important to establish for textual chain of custody. I think there are a couple times where Q confirms an anon list of prior posts, but I haven't seen it laid out in detail and that's worth someone researching and finalizing.
I'm pretty new to this whole thing as well. I can't remember if this video 100% answer your question, but I do know it goes into a lot of details about the trip codes:
Ultimate Q Proofs
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
For me the proof was in the pudding. The first 200 or so posts were describing the Saudi connection to Obama and Clinton, culminating in the Saudi Royal purge, exactly the day HRC/Podesta etc were supposed to be purged. Q later explains that this is a mirror - what happens here happens in middle east first (and then europe, asia etc). And, the whole HRC angle was a red herring to throw the deep state off the track of what was going on in SA.
Honestly, this is one of the finest proofs and actual "prediction". So it does not matter who was posting, they are legit, because they posted such high quality drops.
Good question. Post-tripcode its easy if you accept the notion that the trip cant easily be reverse engineered, but what about before this was used?
The post ID is a session-specific identifier I think - within a thread they should tie the origin of the posts to the same person and/or device, but in other threads? On other days? What if you reboot and try and post again in the same thread, has your ID changed? I dont know enough about how the post IDs function or are generated.
Bottom line, I think its mostly speculation that those early posts are Qs, since I cant see any hard designation that was quoted or sourced from anywhere. Just like if someone with very specific niche expertise posted a deal of advanced info on some obscure topic, and then a similar post was made a couple weeks later. Guesswork... even if they say 'i was the person who posted on this topic previously' that's no assurance of anything.
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233
Here, all the drops. Have fun!