you're making a pretty huge error in taking the dissent as fact. Almost every single decision that SCOTUS makes, there is a dissent in the opposite direction. If we start taking dissents as fact - then the court doesn't have any meaning and no side actually prevails.
you're making a pretty huge error in taking the dissent as fact. Almost every single decision that SCOTUS makes, there is a dissent in the opposite direction. If we start taking dissents as fact - then the court doesn't have any meaning and no side actually prevails.