3
TheBULLman 3 points ago +3 / -0

you're making a pretty huge error in taking the dissent as fact. Almost every single decision that SCOTUS makes, there is a dissent in the opposite direction. If we start taking dissents as fact - then the court doesn't have any meaning and no side actually prevails.

1
TheBULLman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve never heard this and would like to know more. Can you send any information on the “Puerto Rico organization” stuff?

Why would the location have anything to do with whether it’s illegal?l

-1
TheBULLman -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sorry, which portion of the constitution says that?

5
TheBULLman 5 points ago +5 / -0

A few issues with this. That location is the intersection of two shipping lanes... and it appears to be standard movement. If you watch that website for 30 minutes- all of those ships are moving through that location. They are not sitting in that spot. If they really didn’t want to be seen there they would turn off their transponder completely.

Not sure what you mean about zooming in and seeing bubbles...

1
TheBULLman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I hadn't read that, would you send over some information?

3
TheBULLman 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is David Rockefeller... And John was obviously not friends with Zuck and Gates because he has been dead for decades.