Guys,
If you listen to the BardsFM podcast. He has a guest that talks about our court system.
The 1871 Act basically made it impossible for those who don't have "STANDING" with the corporation. To sue that corporation.
This is why legally. The cases are not being heard.
Once we switched over to a corporate structure. Each state had no choice to switch over to a corp that the fed corp recognizes.
Which means. A "STATE" would now have legal standing to sue the federal corp.
That's my understanding of this.
So we cannot blame the judges who say there is no standing. Legally.. it is true via previous changes made.
They still can choose to hear the cases if they want to. But it's legal for them to say that Trump does not have any standing with the US Corporation.
It's their "Legal Out" of hearing the case. I assume this is how the US Corp wanted to it be designed.
So does that stand with the 2A and 1A? Why was Texas' suit from December thrown out? They didn't have standing either?
Was Texas thrown out because of Standing? It shouldn't have been.
I believe it was a technicality but don't remember now for sure. Obviously they never challenged because I don't think they appealed.