Agreed.
If we didn't pay taxes for a service. The blame could be shifted elsewhere.
But when the collective gives them trillions in taxes. Then the relationship becomes very transactional.
The expectations of safe streets is on the government who we pay to make that happen.
The way I see crime is simple. Safety and enforcement of property rights is the basic points of paying taxes.
We pay for security services.
So when the security services does a poor job. They have to take the blame first.
Because it’s transactional.
We collectively give them money. In exchange they are supposed to remove the bad apples.
I will keep repeating this.
IF CRIME IS CONSISTENT in area.
Stop blaming the people. IT'S THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT!!!
Trump made Elon rich in my view: Most of his companies aren’t even making a profit.
I am not a fan of this fake net worth of the stock market.
Well said!
The government causes problems by using "selected" groups as a platform to gain money and power.
Once these "selected" groups are used up. They move onto another "selected" group.
This proves what I have been saying.
We like to blame each other on racial lines.
It's the GOVERNMENT who is doing it.
It's all a scam.
When I look around in the real world, outside of social media, I don't see white people and black people fighting in large numbers.
When I start seeing millions of white and black Americans who work together every day in corporate America suddenly fighting each other at work, then I'll believe something major is going on.
Look at NCAA sports for example.
Black and white athletes work together as teammates every day. The coaches are often both black and white as well.
Do we see NCAA football and basketball teams constantly breaking into racial conflicts?
No, we do not.
Most people are simply trying to go to work, take care of their families, build careers, win games, and live their lives.
Social media often amplifies conflict because conflict gets attention. But the reality most people experience day-to-day looks very different from what is constantly pushed online.
Black guy here!
No one is going to listen to these fools. I guess they need to buy their rent a mob again.
I think you're responding to an argument I never made.
I never claimed that black people aren't human, nor did I claim they come from a different source or origin.
My point was much simpler.
You argued that one group is more aggressive than another. My response is that examples of aggression can be found in every group.
For example, a white friend of mine was telling me about his family situation this past weekend.
His mother, while drunk, threw a baseball at his son's face and split his nose open. She then started punching him in the face.
A year earlier, his father tried to run him over with a car.
I've heard countless stories involving white people committing violent acts.
What does that prove?
Not that white people are inherently violent.
It proves that some people do bad things.
The problem is that the worst examples tend to receive the most attention. Violent incidents make headlines. Ordinary, law-abiding people do not.
So when discussing aggression, we have to be careful about drawing conclusions about entire groups based on the behavior of a subset of individuals.
My argument is that the existence of aggressive people within a group does not automatically tell us something fundamental about the group as a whole. It may simply tell us that every population contains a mix of personalities, behaviors, and individuals who make good or bad choices.
When it comes to black stats being higher per captia.
Yeah???
What do we expect here??
THE SYSTEM KEEPS RELEASING THESE THUGS BACK TO THE STREETS
So ONE black THUG can be a MULTIPLE STAT offender!
The Bible is not physical evidence that angels had sex with humans.
A religious text may be evidence of a belief, but it is not the same thing as physical, scientific proof.
There is no verifiable physical evidence that angels reproduced with human beings.
As for the dog-and-wolf comparison, dogs and gray wolves share more than 99% of their DNA and have the same number of chromosomes. They can successfully reproduce because they are extremely closely related biologically.
The fact that wolves are generally more aggressive than domesticated dogs does not make them a different kind of being. They are still genetically compatible.
And a wolf being more aggressive doesn't prove your point anyway.
Pit bulls can be aggressive. Rottweilers can be aggressive. German Shepherds can be aggressive.
Many dogs are capable of biting people.
So what's the point?
Aggression alone does not demonstrate that a group was created by a different source or possesses fundamentally different origins.
My main question remains the same:
If God intentionally created a group of people with a defective, violent, or destructive gene from the beginning, what would be the purpose of doing that?
Why would an all-knowing creator deliberately introduce a trait that would undermine the very society He intended to build?
That seems self-defeating.
An intelligent designer would presumably seek to strengthen the system, not intentionally weaken it by creating a population predisposed toward destructive behavior from the start.
Low impluse control has nothing to do with murder.
When you are in a court of law for murder. What are they trying to establish here?
"WHAT WAS YOUR MOTIVE TO KILL". What you are suggesting is that black thugs who kill.
Have no motive to kill. They just wake up RANDOMLY. Go outside. Find some RANDOM person and just start shooting out of no where.
If that was true.
Why aren't they also killing their own kids, brothers, sisters, aunts, etc.
Why aren't they shooting their own parents at a large clip???
Well said!
LOL!
I am talking about CLEAR CUT things we can do. A man has a penis correct?
Which means GOD created a PHYSICAL body part we all know 100% exist. This body part can create a CHILD WITH ANY HEALTHY WOMAN!!!
We can see that!
Have you or anyone that you know WITNESS an ANGEL coming down to earth. Having sex with a human.
Which created a half human/angel child???
Do you not see the difference here?
No one is giving a thug a pass.
I am saying if it was generic.
Me and my whole family would be violent to. We are not.
Which means the genetic theory is bullshit. This gene only works sometimes and is random!!
It’s all lies and bullshit.
You have no real proof about Angels existence. You are going by faith.
I am going by 100 percent 💯 proof. Using the Bible isn’t proof of anything:
That’s faith.
lol.
Thanks. The word I like to use now is WHEN.
IQ does matter. The question I like to ask. When does it matter.
For normal day to day conversations: Not too much:
The CIA and intel agencies don't spend billions of mind altering studies for no reason.
They know what works to destroy areas. Which is why they are doing it to white people now as well.
I think you and I both can agree. That white culture is also on the decline now.
That's because no matter what IQ you have. The Cabal deals in emotional control. They know what works long term.
Most criminals think through their actions before they commit them.
Why?
Because they don't want to get caught.
They often spend time planning what they're going to do, how they're going to do it, and how they're going to avoid detection afterward.
That's why I've always been skeptical of broad claims that criminal behavior can be explained simply by IQ scores.
You also have to consider who is willing to participate in testing and how seriously they take it.
Why would you assume that every criminal is interested in, motivated to take, or willing to cooperate with standardized testing?
Many criminals are anti-authority by nature.
They often reject rules, institutions, and social standards in the first place.
So if someone already distrusts authority, dislikes being evaluated, or has no incentive to perform well on a test, it raises legitimate questions about how accurately those scores reflect their actual abilities.
My point is that criminal behavior is more complex than simply labeling people as unintelligent. Planning, risk assessment, deception, and avoiding detection all require some degree of thought and decision-making, even if those abilities are being used for harmful purposes.
What I'm saying is that most everyday situations have very little to do with IQ.
People often act as though intelligence is the most important factor in life, but most daily interactions require communication, not complex problem-solving.
Think about it for a minute.
Imagine you're out to dinner with a group of friends. If one person suddenly starts discussing highly abstract theories, advanced mathematics, or deep intellectual concepts, most people at the table probably won't be able to follow the conversation.
At that point, the issue isn't intelligence. It's communication.
I once read that one reason Donald Trump connected with so many people was that his speeches were delivered at a very simple reading and comprehension level.
Whether you agree with him or not, the message was easy for a large audience to understand.
The lesson is that effective communication is often about simplicity, not complexity.
The more intelligence someone tries to inject into ordinary conversations, the greater the risk that they lose the ability to connect with the average person.
Being intelligent is valuable.
Being able to translate complex ideas into simple language is even more valuable.
That's why many of the best teachers, leaders, salespeople, and communicators aren't necessarily the people with the highest IQs.
They're the people who can take complicated ideas and make them understandable to everyone else.
Agreed