Guys,
If you listen to the BardsFM podcast. He has a guest that talks about our court system.
The 1871 Act basically made it impossible for those who don't have "STANDING" with the corporation. To sue that corporation.
This is why legally. The cases are not being heard.
Once we switched over to a corporate structure. Each state had no choice to switch over to a corp that the fed corp recognizes.
Which means. A "STATE" would now have legal standing to sue the federal corp.
That's my understanding of this.
So we cannot blame the judges who say there is no standing. Legally.. it is true via previous changes made.
I thought the Texas case was due to something else. Any links on this? I can't remember.
It was due to no standing.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/11/supreme-court-dismisses-texas-2020-election-challenge-alito-and-thomas-disagree/