Usually when people default to belittling their opponent its because they're wrong and desperate. You honestly don't speak with a tone of confidence but with a tone of arrogance. So I'm going to choose to not believe your baseless and sourceless claims spoken from arrogance, and will instead believe the ones with bases and sources spoken with sincerity.
A party that is not involved in litigation but gives expert testimony when the court asks. They can support public interest not being addressed in the trial.
P.S. "baseless and sourceless claims" sounds like some shit CNN would say about Donald Trump or "QAnon."
u/Inhimwekek was correct in his definition of Amicus Curiae, EVEN if he spelled it wrong and is larping as a retired lawyer. If he's telling the truth about that second part, the only person with an arrogant tone is you.
I’ll tell you again, an Amicus brief is a “friend of the Court” brief filed by a non-party.
What is AMICUS CURIAE?
A party that is not involved in litigation but gives expert testimony when the court asks. They can support public interest not being addressed in the trial.
The definition proves u/Inhimwekek is right and you are wrong. It's funny you don't find yourself arrogant when you claim the exact opposite.
Usually when people default to belittling their opponent its because they're wrong and desperate. You honestly don't speak with a tone of confidence but with a tone of arrogance. So I'm going to choose to not believe your baseless and sourceless claims spoken from arrogance, and will instead believe the ones with bases and sources spoken with sincerity.
I only care about truth.
Black's Law Dictionary
What is AMICUS CURIAE?
A party that is not involved in litigation but gives expert testimony when the court asks. They can support public interest not being addressed in the trial.
https://thelawdictionary.org/amicus-curiae/
P.S. "baseless and sourceless claims" sounds like some shit CNN would say about Donald Trump or "QAnon."
u/Inhimwekek was correct in his definition of Amicus Curiae, EVEN if he spelled it wrong and is larping as a retired lawyer. If he's telling the truth about that second part, the only person with an arrogant tone is you.
Saying baseless and sourceless is valid when it’s literally just a statement with nothing to back it up.
Your definition literally proves the post.
That’s funny you find me arrogant.
What is AMICUS CURIAE?
A party that is not involved in litigation but gives expert testimony when the court asks. They can support public interest not being addressed in the trial.
The definition proves u/Inhimwekek is right and you are wrong. It's funny you don't find yourself arrogant when you claim the exact opposite.
YoUr DeFiNiTiOn LiTeRaLlY pRoVeS tHe PoSt.