1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

You named one country, and the only country, with comparable arable land to the US and Canada. But no, it isn’t “a lot more”. What is your point? You’re really just stretching to argue now.

https://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~kimball/Field.ggr.htm

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

How American to be threatened like this at your own home, and instead of running/moving, you just invite your armed friends over for a bbq.

4
SirCamembert 4 points ago +4 / -0

You might want to familiarize yourself more with American agriculture then. Most all of the farms are owned by families. There’s far more land in America to be farmed than elsewhere in the world. There’s entire farm towns and counties where absolutely everyone is either a farmer or rancher or trucker.

5
SirCamembert 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bullshit. Large tractors mean mega-farms? What does that mean? Can small families not own mega farms anymore? I come from a farm family. Family owned farm. They have huge tractors. They’re successful, lots of land.

Seriously, what kind of observation is this really?

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't doubt you but do you have a source? I'll search the texts myself if you have a link to that.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it’d actually be “wake the fuck up, we must.”

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought the 3 added stars on the bottom is a bigger difference than a differently shaped shield.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Program a bit better because this reply makes absolutely no sense. A little too generic of an insult.

10
SirCamembert 10 points ago +10 / -0

There’s legal obligation and it gets passed off if any one entity declares bankruptcy. First it’s the lending banks, then it’s the DTCC, which will automatically buy at market value to cover, then if their insurance money runs out, it legally gets passed onto the fed. They can print money.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

The necessary scare event may be Russia and China threatening the US with nuclear retaliation over the use of Covid on the rest of the world unless they admit to charges against specific people. It sure would wake up a ton of people. I think they’re part of the plan, but even if the deepstate knows they’d bluffing, imagine what the normal people would think if they actually called the bluff? They’re stuck in that situation.

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s purposefully an oversimplification of the reality that makes the reader assume something absurd from preconceptions other than the reality.

3
SirCamembert 3 points ago +3 / -0

You honestly can't figure for certain anything about how similarly a human will react to something in the same way as test animals. You can only really make educated guesses, but there's always interactions that are unknown until they are actually observed. Living bodies are just that complex. Not even every human reacts to everything the same way.

0
SirCamembert 0 points ago +1 / -1

Gaslighting. Cool. Literally a classic example.

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does this post belong on a Q board and why haven’t the mods removed this yet?

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really? You don't understand the purpose of me asking what the purpose of this post is?

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm asleep for thinking this point is a common sense perspective?

5
SirCamembert 5 points ago +5 / -0

And the mono-/di-/tri- sodium something-ate (ex. mono-sodium-glutamate, tri-sodium-posphate) added to preserve the artificial flavors (including unnaturally extracted "natural" flavors) since the normal neutralized sodium in table salt doesn't react with your taste buds quick enough to fool you into thinking its a fresh flavor.

Whenever you hear about sodium being bad, that's actually what is meant. It's the free sodium ions that will leech any mineral it can from your body before it can even be filtered out by your kidneys. Salt isn't nearly as much a problem because it comes with the chloride to neutralize it.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure this is a bot. Not even good at answering questions.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why didn’t you answer the question? Clearly God is a large part of Q’s plan, since he mentions it so much as being a spiritual battle. Why would you trust someone who is “oblivious religious”?

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Deal with” I think you mean sling insults like a child lol you literally bring up zero discussion points.

So how do you trust Q and his plan, when Q is putting faith in God? What if God is Q’s plan this whole time? Why are you here?

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow that must be really difficult for you to resolve, to think that Q believes in dumb shit, yet here you are.

You’d fit in better at PDW.

view more: Next ›