I think we need to add to the resources here. I know the board is Q related, but resources related to combating the disinformation that has been spread during the pandemic would be useful.
Furthermore, the observable data and evidence of infection rates indicates that no mitigation measures of any kind have had ANY impact on reducing infections, rates or mortality. In other words, had "nothing" been done... nothing would be different, other than less economic impact and likely quicker achievement of herd immunity (which is already here, and will be certainly here within a month or two)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/well-have-herd-immunity-by-april-11613669731
I like the first article, but am skeptical on your second because I believe they WHO changed some things to make it look like we are getting over covid at a faster rate in order to make Biden look good. The article states, 'since January 8 there has been a large decline in cases'... hmmm 2 days after the inauguration we suddenly are getting over the virus??' That's suspect to me.
No question about it, they changed the test standards to drive down the counts. That's absolutely true, and the timing was purposeful. However, the administration still wants to subject everyone for longer... hence they are announcing months more suffering and mask wearing. The Johns Hopkins doctor's opinion makes sense. We are nearing the point where so many have been (known or not) previously exposed, or have been vaccinated, that herd immunity will be quite strong. Mitigation has been a colossal failure, and there will be NO justification for ANY further mitigating actions within 2 months.
I think we need to add to the resources here. I know the board is Q related, but resources related to combating the disinformation that has been spread during the pandemic would be useful.
The truth is that the only actual scientific study that has been done showed masks do absolutely nothing.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/18/major-study-finds-masks-dont-reduce-covid-19-infection-rates/
Furthermore, the observable data and evidence of infection rates indicates that no mitigation measures of any kind have had ANY impact on reducing infections, rates or mortality. In other words, had "nothing" been done... nothing would be different, other than less economic impact and likely quicker achievement of herd immunity (which is already here, and will be certainly here within a month or two) https://www.wsj.com/articles/well-have-herd-immunity-by-april-11613669731
I like the first article, but am skeptical on your second because I believe they WHO changed some things to make it look like we are getting over covid at a faster rate in order to make Biden look good. The article states, 'since January 8 there has been a large decline in cases'... hmmm 2 days after the inauguration we suddenly are getting over the virus??' That's suspect to me.
No question about it, they changed the test standards to drive down the counts. That's absolutely true, and the timing was purposeful. However, the administration still wants to subject everyone for longer... hence they are announcing months more suffering and mask wearing. The Johns Hopkins doctor's opinion makes sense. We are nearing the point where so many have been (known or not) previously exposed, or have been vaccinated, that herd immunity will be quite strong. Mitigation has been a colossal failure, and there will be NO justification for ANY further mitigating actions within 2 months.