I asked my priest what he thought of the Catholic schools and he says its no way a guarantee of anything and that the Catholic schools are just as infiltrated as the public schools. Are you experiencing this where you are? Or have they done a pretty good job teaching the faith and steering away from the relativist propaganda?
It's our first year, due to covid. I'll say it's definitely an improvement over public school, but there are moments where I catch things that are a little off and then we have a discussion about it. The worst was when my 6th grade daughter's teacher was insisting that the CDC guidelines stated that she wear a mask at home. I went straight to the principal on that one.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Interesting. We are in catholic school and my son recently mentioned he has to do an autobiography. I will have to find out more!
I asked my priest what he thought of the Catholic schools and he says its no way a guarantee of anything and that the Catholic schools are just as infiltrated as the public schools. Are you experiencing this where you are? Or have they done a pretty good job teaching the faith and steering away from the relativist propaganda?
It's our first year, due to covid. I'll say it's definitely an improvement over public school, but there are moments where I catch things that are a little off and then we have a discussion about it. The worst was when my 6th grade daughter's teacher was insisting that the CDC guidelines stated that she wear a mask at home. I went straight to the principal on that one.
Jesuit = Communist
Not even close. The Jesuits formed to fight the Communist. Nice Freemasonic propaganda ya got there.
Well, the Society of Jesus (like the pope) are big proponents of “liberation theology”...
Jesuits are the cabal mafia and the Pope’s thugs. They are also known for secreting artifacts away from around the world, like the Smithsonian.
Abstract
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p97_97.xml?language=en