Many Catholics agree with you on this! Thing is, we don't have to listen to the Pope when he speaks off the chair. Only statements on dogma and something else are infallible.
The first type of definition is by a Pope alone when he speaks “ex cathedra”—”from the chair” of Peter—that is, when “acting in the office of shepherd and teacher of all Christians, he defines, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, a doctrine concerning faith and morals to be held by the universal Church.”
Everything else is up for us to decide on personally. So we have this Pope that says the proper things officially from the Chair as he is called to do, but then he's out shaking hands with pagans and liberals and blah blah. Add to that the pedophile scandals. It isn't a good look AT ALL....BUUUUUT WHEN YOU CONSIDER who is telling you these things? About the church? It's the Kinsey guys who masturbated infants who are telling you what to think on the MSM.
There's like 11 or 12 episodes on the Jesuits alone, context, etc. He also goes over what I said above about the pedo thing and psychology in America today, the roots of it, etc.
Freemasonry and Catholicism are antithetical to one another. Catholicism 101 says Communism is a no-go. The Ten Commandments cover this. "Thou shalt not steal." Well to steal from another, one would have to posses an item, aka, private property.
The #1 enemy of Freemasonry is Catholicism. Many Catholics are aware that the highest seat in the church appears to be infiltrated and there is a long history of this happening in the church. Satan wants us to throw the baby out with the bathwater and write off Catholicism, when in reality, the Relativist/Hermetic/Rosicrusian/Freemasonic/Dualistic/Gnostic/New Age Golem is causing the constant revolution inside the church and society.
This is what Alex Mossad Media Matrix Jones will never tell you. He and his ilk (left, right, two wings of the same bird) wants 1776, constant Masonic revolution that siphons power from the bottom to the top. The truther world is comprised of the Protestant/Freemasonic propaganda so what you learn in these videos may paint a better picture. Read as: details the Freemasons and Rockefellers and mainstream Barnes and Noble history book writers forgot to leave out.
Infiltrated and corrupted. In 1934 the world was a very different place. 80+ years later the Jesuits are fully aligned with communism, liberation theology, social justice, and pedophilia. Once an institution is fully corrupt, it no longer matters what they were founded on.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Jesuit = Communist
Not even close. The Jesuits formed to fight the Communist. Nice Freemasonic propaganda ya got there.
Well, the Society of Jesus (like the pope) are big proponents of “liberation theology”...
They were infiltrated.
Many Catholics agree with you on this! Thing is, we don't have to listen to the Pope when he speaks off the chair. Only statements on dogma and something else are infallible.
Everything else is up for us to decide on personally. So we have this Pope that says the proper things officially from the Chair as he is called to do, but then he's out shaking hands with pagans and liberals and blah blah. Add to that the pedophile scandals. It isn't a good look AT ALL....BUUUUUT WHEN YOU CONSIDER who is telling you these things? About the church? It's the Kinsey guys who masturbated infants who are telling you what to think on the MSM.
You will like: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtKxMklQeXbXpwe4_Xk9vru9WGQJvXHK
There's like 11 or 12 episodes on the Jesuits alone, context, etc. He also goes over what I said above about the pedo thing and psychology in America today, the roots of it, etc.
Freemasonry and Catholicism are antithetical to one another. Catholicism 101 says Communism is a no-go. The Ten Commandments cover this. "Thou shalt not steal." Well to steal from another, one would have to posses an item, aka, private property.
The #1 enemy of Freemasonry is Catholicism. Many Catholics are aware that the highest seat in the church appears to be infiltrated and there is a long history of this happening in the church. Satan wants us to throw the baby out with the bathwater and write off Catholicism, when in reality, the Relativist/Hermetic/Rosicrusian/Freemasonic/Dualistic/Gnostic/New Age Golem is causing the constant revolution inside the church and society.
This is what Alex Mossad Media Matrix Jones will never tell you. He and his ilk (left, right, two wings of the same bird) wants 1776, constant Masonic revolution that siphons power from the bottom to the top. The truther world is comprised of the Protestant/Freemasonic propaganda so what you learn in these videos may paint a better picture. Read as: details the Freemasons and Rockefellers and mainstream Barnes and Noble history book writers forgot to leave out.
Infiltrated and corrupted. In 1934 the world was a very different place. 80+ years later the Jesuits are fully aligned with communism, liberation theology, social justice, and pedophilia. Once an institution is fully corrupt, it no longer matters what they were founded on.
Jesuits are the cabal mafia and the Pope’s thugs. They are also known for secreting artifacts away from around the world, like the Smithsonian.
Like who? And what?
https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p97_97.xml?language=en
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Abstract
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p97_97.xml?language=en