Neither the title of this post, nor the quoted tweet has anything to do with Craig Wright, let alone whether or not he is Satoshi.
You have been gas-lit and are being distracted by a misleading narrative designed to discredit BSV, utilizing all the same dirty commie tactics they used to attack Trump and his supporters.
You are no different from a libtard appealing to the opinions of "experts". The same biased experts who have conflicts of interest and huge personal incentives to publicly hold their opinion, as they have a vested interest in furthering certain dishonest narratives.
I would recommend you stop believing what other people tell you, and do some actual research, but I do understand why you would not be willing or capable of doing so. This is a very complicated situation related to a technical subject which requires extensive research about the history of many related things, as well as a technical understanding of block chain technology, in order to come to your own informed position.
Whether Craig Wright is actually Satoshi or not changes absolutely nothing about the facts of the situation and viability of the technology. That said, given everything I know, it's far more likely that he is Satoshi than not.
Craig Wright is not Satoshi. Nick Szabo and Adam Back have both said that.
Trump did not win the election. Joe Biden and Barack Obama have both said that.
You don't know who they are do you?
Neither the title of this post, nor the quoted tweet has anything to do with Craig Wright, let alone whether or not he is Satoshi.
You have been gas-lit and are being distracted by a misleading narrative designed to discredit BSV, utilizing all the same dirty commie tactics they used to attack Trump and his supporters.
You are no different from a libtard appealing to the opinions of "experts". The same biased experts who have conflicts of interest and huge personal incentives to publicly hold their opinion, as they have a vested interest in furthering certain dishonest narratives.
I would recommend you stop believing what other people tell you, and do some actual research, but I do understand why you would not be willing or capable of doing so. This is a very complicated situation related to a technical subject which requires extensive research about the history of many related things, as well as a technical understanding of block chain technology, in order to come to your own informed position.
Whether Craig Wright is actually Satoshi or not changes absolutely nothing about the facts of the situation and viability of the technology. That said, given everything I know, it's far more likely that he is Satoshi than not.
A coin named Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision has nothing to do with whether or not Craig Wright is Satoshi??
Reasoning is not one if your strengths is it? I guess that is why you think Wright is Satoshi but don't know who Nick Szabo and Adam Back are?