Since most of the swamp are satanic pedos is not improbable. I take your point, but we should not be censoring posts because the other side could use them against us (which they do anyway) - unless they are way off the chart (like the BS Simon Parkes and Chalie Ward put out).
You don't think accusing the ex-VP of raping a 177 kids and murdering 50+ is "way off the chart (like the BS Simon Parkes and Charlie Ward put out)"? Hmmm?
As I said, given what we know about Podesta and others it not improbable. Reliable sources like Field McConnell always maintained Pence was dirty. Someone who claims to have sex with aliens is off the chart, to my way of thinking. Others are free to disagree.
JohnHereToHelp statements about Pence describe Pence as closeted homosexual who benefited from a back channel arranging “dates”; the young men being brought to Pence became younger and younger... that’s the dirt on Pence.
JohnHereToHelp testimony as a whistleblower has credibility because he is (real name escapes me) involved in court cases and has been indicted for his involvement in deep state crimes.
Accusations of more extreme crimes require either solid evidence or solid means-to-know. “Remote viewing” is less credible than “hearsay” — and less admissible (i.e. less than zero).
Q research, for the first 2 plus years, was characterized by its skeptical nature and critical analysis - sauced claims, verifiable associations, tangible means, alternative explanations disproven, etc.
As Q has gone “mainstream” every shiny bauble tossed in this crowd elicits ‘oohs and ahs’ as if mesmerized by a mystical orb.
This is the kind of stuff that needs to come out. Full disclosure. Fear of looking like a nutter is an excellent tool to keep this under wraps.
Since most of the swamp are satanic pedos is not improbable. I take your point, but we should not be censoring posts because the other side could use them against us (which they do anyway) - unless they are way off the chart (like the BS Simon Parkes and Chalie Ward put out).
You don't think accusing the ex-VP of raping a 177 kids and murdering 50+ is "way off the chart (like the BS Simon Parkes and Charlie Ward put out)"? Hmmm?
Evidence? Who needs that?
Some other guy saw it in a vision or says he did, so I go post it on the Webz.
Now that's what I call research!
As I said, given what we know about Podesta and others it not improbable. Reliable sources like Field McConnell always maintained Pence was dirty. Someone who claims to have sex with aliens is off the chart, to my way of thinking. Others are free to disagree.
JohnHereToHelp statements about Pence describe Pence as closeted homosexual who benefited from a back channel arranging “dates”; the young men being brought to Pence became younger and younger... that’s the dirt on Pence.
JohnHereToHelp testimony as a whistleblower has credibility because he is (real name escapes me) involved in court cases and has been indicted for his involvement in deep state crimes.
Accusations of more extreme crimes require either solid evidence or solid means-to-know. “Remote viewing” is less credible than “hearsay” — and less admissible (i.e. less than zero).
Q research, for the first 2 plus years, was characterized by its skeptical nature and critical analysis - sauced claims, verifiable associations, tangible means, alternative explanations disproven, etc.
As Q has gone “mainstream” every shiny bauble tossed in this crowd elicits ‘oohs and ahs’ as if mesmerized by a mystical orb.