I think this new movie with Tom Hanks protecting this little girl is part of a psyop to make us think he’s not a pedophile. That is all.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (102)
sorted by:
Of course. I'm not sure how that's relevant to what I said.
I promise you, I am not trolling you on purpose. Look at my post history if you wish to see what type of responses I give.
You spoke about Tom Hanks brother and implied he must be guilty by relation. I suggested we:
People who study Q want evidence. Sometimes we appreciate speculation, but mostly this is a critical thinking exercise. You are calling me a troll for suggesting we only convict people we have evidence for. I am flabbergasted by such a response.
We all want to escape our Luciferian bonds. We all want justice. But we must not be bloodthirsty. There is a very good reason our justice system begins with "Innocent until proven guilty." Despite the corruption that has invaded it, that is still the appropriate place to start.
There is zero good in the mentality of "guilty by association" and that was the main statement I was making. If you saw something different than either I misspoke, or you misunderstood.
Pretty sad that we have to tell grown adults this.
Was this not implying that because he "must be a Rothschild descendent" that he was guilty of wrong doings? If not, then I misunderstood and my response was misplaced. If that is the case then I apologize.
However, I'm fairly certain my response never fell into the category of "Lefty douche-baggery." If you think so, then I suggest maybe you read it with anger and did not hear what I actually said.
Regardless I am happy to let it go. You are welcome to hate whomever you choose. I'd even die trying to defend your right to hate me (if some entity was trying to take such acts of free will away from us all).