There are many ways to form an LLC without ever revealing the controlling members. For example, there is a large cottage industry in Wyoming whose entire existence is to form LLCs for a person/persons who do not ever want to be associated with the LLC but still have full control. This is done through these "agents" who, for a fee, stand in for the unnamed Member. Many of these "agents" are law firms. It has long been a way of hiding assets and or income from spouses or govt eyes by registering the asset in the name of the LLC via the Agent. Think yachts, aircraft, bank accounts, etc. being owned by these shell LLCs.
In most cases, the real LLC Managing Member never signs a single official document anywhere, except on the representation contract which is kept in the private and personal files of the "Agent". Knowing this, I doubt the Barrs would have ever attached their name to such an organization for the purposes of receiving a payoff if same could be achieved without ever disclosing the relationship. Additionally, a TRUSTED attorney hired by Barr could have provided enough shielding to never publicly tie the Barr name to any traceable entity. IMO the Barr/LLC relationship is bogus or fake news or maybe blatant enough to be a frame. More deep digging is need to verify the story. Most large deposits like that cannot be withdrawn so quickly on a new account without triggering a "know your customer" internal flag.
Second time I've seen a similar story today. NOT outside the realm of possibility especially in light of how Barr went out . . . like a little cucked bitch.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
There are many ways to form an LLC without ever revealing the controlling members. For example, there is a large cottage industry in Wyoming whose entire existence is to form LLCs for a person/persons who do not ever want to be associated with the LLC but still have full control. This is done through these "agents" who, for a fee, stand in for the unnamed Member. Many of these "agents" are law firms. It has long been a way of hiding assets and or income from spouses or govt eyes by registering the asset in the name of the LLC via the Agent. Think yachts, aircraft, bank accounts, etc. being owned by these shell LLCs.
In most cases, the real LLC Managing Member never signs a single official document anywhere, except on the representation contract which is kept in the private and personal files of the "Agent". Knowing this, I doubt the Barrs would have ever attached their name to such an organization for the purposes of receiving a payoff if same could be achieved without ever disclosing the relationship. Additionally, a TRUSTED attorney hired by Barr could have provided enough shielding to never publicly tie the Barr name to any traceable entity. IMO the Barr/LLC relationship is bogus or fake news or maybe blatant enough to be a frame. More deep digging is need to verify the story. Most large deposits like that cannot be withdrawn so quickly on a new account without triggering a "know your customer" internal flag.
Second time I've seen a similar story today. NOT outside the realm of possibility especially in light of how Barr went out . . . like a little cucked bitch.
Some clever autists should be able to find out if there really was an LLC called Conservative Truth Initiative in Mrs. Barr's name.
$7m is a lot of cheddar cheese
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing some evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise and time: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
dude, trust me