there are several ways that I'm aware of besides the old FU
-
religious exemption - most if not all states allow this, even my hard core leftist commonwealth. this combined with the fact that the vaccines I believe contain fetal tissue (there are some downplaying this claiming that they actually use "fetal cell lines" meaning the cells have been multiplied using original fetal cells) can be added to religious/moral claim.
-
allergies to POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL - which as I understand is present in the vaccines and is also present in things like Miralax and antifreeze. say you realized your severe allergic reaction to it when you used Miralax and look up the symptoms it causes so you are educated if asked.
-
Nuremberg Code - this should be an absolute lock. there are many reasons the Nuremberg Code is applicable but one of the most glaring is #3 which requires the vaccines have been properly tested on animals, which the vaccines have not. if your employer or others still demand you get the jab you should have a strong lawsuit and you should pursue it.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199711133372006
- EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) vaccines can't be mandated - as with anything you can probably find an alternative opinion, but this linked story and the logic leads me to believe that it can't be mandated. you may need to do more homework on this claim.
good luck
I do not consent to wearing a mask, complying with unlawful mandates, and any requirement to take experimental unproven non-medically necessary "vaccines."
No one has ever asked for my consent to wear a mask as is required for any medical procedure or practice. A mask is a healthcare device and as such it is to be administered by my physician with my complete un-coerced informed consent.
I haven't been given informed consent as to the effectiveness of masks.
Show me the peer-reviewed studies with multiple repeatedly tested results in clinical trials showing the effectiveness of all types of masks and materials typically worn stopping viruses! Better yet, show me studies prior to January 2020 and the Covid-19 "Pandemic" so that I know they weren't funded to push a mask wearing agenda! I bet that's real difficult to do.
Here's 7 seperate doctors showing they don't work from studies prior to the Plannedemic: https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
Dr Fauci is now a proven liar and fraud as he is on the record stating masks are ineffective due to people adjusting them too much, seen not wearing them multiple times despite telling the American people that we should, and then saying 2 masks are better than one.
Here's Dr Fauci lying to us about herd immunity: https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/12/28/fauci-admits-hes-been-lying-to-us-about-herd-immunity-in-order-to-manipulate-us-n300795
Here's the paper Dr Fraudci co-authored detailing the bacterial infections during the Spanish Flu because people wore useless masks that created a warm moist breeding ground. The masks were just as ineffective then as they are today. This is history which most have failed to learn from. I haven't because I hold a Bachelors Degree in History and read history books while everyone else reads tabloids and fiction. Click the PDF button to download. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/198/7/962/2192118
You want to use the fraudulent and phony death count numbers to scare me into wearing a mask? Dr Fauci failed to provide adequate information seeing as he was the head of the NIH in 2005 when a paper detailing the effectiveness of Chloroquine against Coronavirus/SARS. That means he is directly responsible for all of those deaths and the Mainstream Media as well for their willful discrediting of HCQ as a CHEAP and EFFECTIVE treatment method for treating Covid-19. 2005 NIH study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Of course if it's Cheap then you can't make money on the treatment and all the unnecessary masks you want to sell. If HCQ is effective, you can't scare the public into staying home so you can push for mail-in voting and The Great Reset.
Long term mask use can contribute to lung cancer. My grandmother had lung cancer and my father has emphazema which means I could be more susceptible. https://www.globalresearch.ca/long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-advanced-stage-lung-cancer-study-finds/5736339
Dentists have been warning about a phenomenon known as ‘mask mouth’ in which patients are arriving back to the dental office with an increase in gingivitis and tooth decay as high as 50% in a period of just a few months since mask mandates began. My oral health supercedes your irrational Covid fear. https://phillipschneider.com/mask-mouth-dentists-warn-gum-disease-and-tooth-decay-have-increased-50-since-mask-mandates-began/
Considering heart disease has been linked to gingivitis for decades, that is yet another reason I do not consent to wearing a mask.
Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) show that only 6% of coronavirus deaths are attributed to Covid-19 alone, while the other 94% have been associated with an average of 2.6 comorbidities. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/08/30/cdc-admits-that-94-percent-of-covid-19-deaths-had-other-causes-conditions/
I do not have any other health problems therefore my risk level is extremely low, in line with my risk level for influenza every year of which there were no mask mandates. The United States Air Force entrusted me to apply Operational Risk Management principles for a decade. I think I am more than capable of doing the same for my own health.
Masks themselves pose a long term threat due to chemical off gassing of Volitle Organic Compounds that make up the mask. When wearing a synthetic mask the person is filtering their air through a synthetic material that outgases the petrochemically derived constituents that most are made of. The masked individual is then breathing in those aerosolized toxic chemicals.
Brand new products just taken out of a box are notorious for outgassing various chemical toxins. Many of the highest rated masks even off-gas noxious VOCs (volatile organic compounds) because the optimal filtration structure requires such a matrix of chemical compounds. In the case of a new mask, which is placed right over the mouth and nose, these vaporized chemicals go right into both airways.
Every mask I have worn has migrated up my face into my eyesight causing a visual obstruction which requires me to then touch and adjust the mask every few minutes, precisely what you should not do in order to minimize moisture and virus particulate transfer.
My beard combined with my warm breath trapped by the mask produces irritation and itching which also leads to me scratching my face and adjusting the mask thereby causing transfer of germs from face to hands to shared surfaces. It is unfeasible and not medically sound to disinfect my hands every time this happens which leads to another good point:
Where are the long term studies and peer reviewed articles showing the risks and side effects of using isopropyl alcohol based sanitizers on my skin repeatedly?
Any single one if these issues is enough to constitute withdrawal of my consent. Every single one of these is backed up with scientific evidence. The mask mandates are not.
50% of all legitimate Covid-19 deaths came from elderly people with comorbidities stuffed into nursing homes by the governors of just 5 states to sell the pandemic fear. I am not elderly. I do not have comorvidities.
Even the CDC's own study proved masks don't work! According to the CDC's own study of 154 Covid cases, 3.9% had never worn a mask prior to getting sick whereas 70.6% had always worn a mask prior to getting sick. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6936a5.htm?s_cid=mm6936a5_w
Forcing masks (and Vaccines) is a violation of the Nuremberg Code and a Human Rights violation. The US is a signatory of the Nuremberg Code and the 2005 UNESCO update. The US and the major nations of the world made the Nuremberg Code after seeing the medical experiments and atrocities of the Nazi's.
A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)
Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Read more: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180E.pdf
Nuremberg Code: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_5.pdf
Article 6 Informed Consent https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajbl/article/download/113690/103409
Let's go over these.
Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.
No one has asked for my consent! No one has given me adequate information! In fact, myself and millions like me have had to do our own research and share it with risk to being deplatformed from our social media accounts for 'mis-information' and 'Violating Community Standards' because that factual and sourced information goes against the deliberate lies and propoganda of the WHO and CDC.
The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
I have never stated that I give my consent to wear a mask in order to shop, work, travel, or anything else necessary to live my life. Even if I had, the term WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE means I can revoke that consent at any time for any reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it!
Read this again carefully. Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
The CDC and WHO guidelines DO NOT overrule my informed consent! No one has that authority! Anyone forcing any mandate (or vaccine) upon your person without your consent is guilty of Human Rights Abuse and should be treated accordingly. I will take all measures including self defense to protect my bodily autonomy and human rights as needed.
Remember that it is against the law to discriminate against someone for a medical condition including a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Being "healthy" is the default medical condition and they have no evidence otherwise you aren't therefore they cannot force you to wear a mask.
It is a Federal Crime to Arrest you for not wearing a mask or not abiding my unconstitutional mandates! https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
Here's some more science for you. The risks of Covid-19 to me are low due to my own blood type, O-Positive.
https://www.verywellhealth.com/type-o-blood-covid-19-5074429
"One of the largest data sets on the topic comes from the genetic testing company 23andMe, which has surveyed over a million people since April. The company’s survey data shows that people with type O blood are 9% to 18% less likely to test positive for COVID-19 than people with other blood types."
Shortly after 23andMe released their initial findings highlighting the protective effect of type O blood on June 8, a group of Harvard Medical School Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital corroborated that people with type O were less likely to test positive for COVID-19.
https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2020/07/blood-type-and-covid-19
https://www.technologynetworks.com/genomics/news/large-study-suggests-blood-type-o-may-be-a-protective-factor-against-covid-19-335881
(Continued from above) I've been taking a multitude of vitamins including Zinc daily ever since this "Pandemic" started and have yet to get sick even when exposed to my girlfriend who had mild symptoms for a total of 19 consecutive days. The reason real medical doctors prescribe Hydroxychloroquine is because it helps facilitate Zinc absorbtion into the alveoli tissue in the lungs to block Covid-19 receptors from binding. Zinc is what stops the virus, Hydroxychloroquine is just the transmission and absorbtion vector.
There is no such thing legally as a Covid-19 Vaccine! It doesn't meet the definition requirements. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/joseph-mercola/covid-19-mrna-shots-are-legally-not-vaccines/
These Covid-19 "vaccines" are not FDA approved. They are under emergency use authorization only. The studies for all coronavirus vaccines are still open and are not due to conclude until at least next year. They are still collecting the data. Therefore, these vaccines are technically considered experimental. Under US informed consent regulations based upon the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki, a person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. There is no way that any health care provider can claim that these vaccines are safe or effective. Those FDA studies are not completed and any claims are preliminary.
To refuse is not being an antivaxer - it is exercising your right to informed consent. In addition, any non healthcare employer is not qualified to give advise as to the risks and benefits of any medically related issue and to do so is practicing medicine without a license and is illegal.
For my employer:
This is not about safety.
You mandate I must take a CBT annually on Bloodborne Pathogens including Hepatitis yet you do not mandate the Hepatitis Vaccines! Therefore you have no standing to dictate I wear a mask or recieve a Covid-19 Vaccine.
I am more likely to drop a heavy object on my floor or have an ergonomic lift injury yet you do not mandate or subsidize safety toe footwear or ergonomic awareness CBTs. These were mandatory when I was in the US Air Force!
Hard Scientific Proof the Whole Thing Is a Hoax—a CORONAhoax
VIDEO: https://app.clouthub.com/post/167fa8d1-70a2-11eb-8438-971418d28768
You want me to wear a mask?
Show me the note from my Primary Care Physician urging me to wear a mask and the accompanying data sheet with the risks and side effects from use as is common with all medical devices.
Show me 7 peer-reviewed scientific studies with clinical trials published prior to 2019 that show a surgical mask is effective at stopping any virus.
Show me peer-reviewed scientific studies with clinical trials showing that the risk of lung cancer from long-term mask wearing is the same or lower than not wearing a mask.
Show me peer-reviewed scientific studies with clinical trials showing that wearing a mask will not cause in increase in gingivitis and associated heart disease.
Show me peer-reviewed scientific studies from every mask manufacturer with clinical trials showing that the materials in the mask do not off-gas Volatile Organic Compounds, toxic substances, or carcinogens. Show me the long term studies of these masks detailing health issues attributed to long term mask wear. The chemicals and respirators we use at work have Safety Data Sheets on file. Where are the ones for the Covid masks? I don't smoke and have been seen wearing a respirator everytime I've sprayed toxic molycote on Engine Fan Blades so you have no argument that I do not take these risks of inhalation of toxic substances seriously.
Please provide me with the company policy mandating I receive Hepatitis and Tetanus vaccination and annual HIV and Tuberculosis testing at the company's expense due to the near certainty of being exposed to these Bloodborne Pathogens since it is inevitable that every Aircraft Mechanic will injure themselves with a open wound as is the nature of working on large complex machines with sharp objects everywhere. The risk of exposure to these is far more likely than catching Covid-19.
While we are on safety at the companies expense since a respiratory illness that doesn't effect everyone is so high of a concern, perhaps the company would like to take the opportunity to provide every Airline worker on the ramp and in Stores up to $250 annual reimbursement for the purchase of 2 pairs of safety toed shoes. 2 pair seems reasonable to allow alternate days wear to minimize foot fungus and allow proper drying following long wear. Seeing as dropped objects onto a worker's toes are a far more likely scenario and safety concern, I'd think the company would welcome the opportunity to show their support for their employees.
Show me peer-reviewed scientific studies with clinical trials and non-manipulated data showing that Covid-19 is any less deadly than the flu and that the Hysteria surrounding it from the media is warranted. I'm still waiting to see videos outside of Chinese propoganda of people dying in the streets like seen in this video compilation: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf4-Vzf1CyM
Provide me with a binding legal document signed by the company President, Board of Directors, and Union Leadership with a $1B healthcare fund in escrow stating that the company will be held liable for any medical issues that can be marginally attributed to wearing a mask while at work. This shouldn't be a problem for the company if they are so secure in their effectiveness and the "science" such that they feel the need to violate my Inalienable Human Rights and Constitutional rights to enforce it.
Show me the section in the US Constitution where anyone has the right to dictate authority over my Healthcare without my consent.
Explain to me how withdrawal of my consent harms you or anyone else in any way? If masks work (and the Covid-19 "vaccine") and you have yours, then what's the problem with me not wearing one? Oh, you want 2 masks, one for me and one for you? Well then problem solved, just follow Dr Fauci's unsolicited advice and wear 2 masks yourself!
Personally, Fauci isn't my physician and I don't take advice from someone that hangs out with associates of child trafficking and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein (didn't hang himself) as Fauci does with Bill Gates, a man whose own vaccine intervention is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths in India and Africa!
Please provide me with the medical data and scientific papers referencing actual laboratory samples documenting that Covid-19 even exists. (The Covid-19 "vaccines" were developed without laboratory samples because China refused to provide them and instead gave the digital file with the genomic code and it was even incomplete!) Considering that 7 major Universities are now suing the CDC for medical fraud as they haven't provided a single sample of Covid-19 for study after examination of 1500 "Covid-19" patients lab work and only finding Influenza types A & B, I'll take my 99.967% survival rate chances especially after already having been exposed allegedly. The PCR tests have been shown to be ineffective due to the high cylce rates producing up to 95% false positives and many were tainted to begin with.
I'd say that the medical necessity to wear a mask isn't any greater than it was in the years prior to 2020 when seasonal influenza hit and the company didn't mandate masks. That makes the company position weak should lawsuits occur if you wish to further pursue this Quixotic battle. It also constitutes withdrawal of my consent without prejudice as is my Human Right per Article 6, section 1 of the Nuremberg Code.
Please provide the companies legal argument that they feel justifies their unlawful discrimination of me under Federal Law including the Americans with Disabilities Act for having a medical condition known as "healthy" and refusing to wear a mask.
Please provide the manner and method the company used to obtain their evidence that I was not healthy and had a respiratory illness requiring a surgical mask. I'm sure that method should it exist violates my rights and privacy and I'd like to start exploring my legal options.
I have been a member of the American Humanist Association since 2007 and Humanism is about minimizing the suffering and harm to others. Humanism is also considered a religious practice. Please explain to me how my refusal to partake in Human Rights violations by refusing to give informed consent to wear a mask and the company's and US Government's unlawful mask mandates are not religious discrimination according to US Federal Law.
As you can see, I have done more due diligence and research into Covid-19 and the hysteria and medical necessity of masks than anyone in the mainstream media, government, or the company appearently as it relates to my own health and the risks I wish to partake in. That risk is my liberty and right under the US Constitution!
The company should welcome this diverse viewpoint and factual opinion as it is all about my journey!
Further note: My views and opinions expressed here are part of my identity as a freedom loving, liberty minded, critical thinking American. As such these values and beliefs are a part of my National Origin as my home country is the United States of America and our country was founded upon these cherished ideals. Therefore, any negative action from any entity against my person for these beliefs and views expressed are protected under my US Constitutional rights under the 1st Amendment AND under 42 USC 2000a, National Origin Discrimination.
Final note, I have been self-identifying as a woman as my Gender Identity since 2017 as current and former co-workers can confirm. Thus, I am an out and proud Masculine Presenting Transgendered Lesbian since current politics and liberal psychological science considers Gender Identity separate from my biological sex at birth, which is male. I choose to continue Presenting myself using Masculine features, dress and appearance, and pronouns. Since I choose to Identify as a woman, I am now considered both a Lesbian and Transgendered both of which afford me rights and legal protections. The most notable legal protection is that as of June 15th, 2020 the US Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 under Title VII that Gender Identity is covered under the term SEX when it comes to discrimination in the workplace from the employer. Now that I am afforded this protection I feel much safer revealing it officialy as prior to June 2020, I felt putting this information out there including on documentation could harm my career.
I bring this all up because if the company wishes to continue pushing mask mandates upon my person with no scientific support or substantial evidence to back their decision and failing to get my informed consent, I feel it only necessary to meet their demand with an equally outrageous demand rooted in just as much science and now declare I will be using the bathroom facilities that conform to my Gender Identity and not my biological sex. I understand that the females I work with may have issue with this but that's just their Workplace Bias (we have a CBT on this) against Masculine Presenting Transgendered Lesbians and reeks of Transphobia. I do not seek separate bathroom accommodation (as nice as it would be to have a toilet all to myself) because that just seems like discrimination and harkens back to Jim Crow "Seperate but Equal" enforcement which I think would be a terrible thing to bring back and probably wouldn't look good from a public relations standpoint.
I am willing to continue using the bathroom facilities that align with my biological sex provided the company cease and desist with their illegal mask mandate and harassment. I feel this is a more than adequate compromise seeing as I literally have to do nothing differently than I have since being hired.